Search for: "People v Word" Results 8641 - 8660 of 17,918
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2014, 2:08 pm by Eric Goldman
Regarding Taco Bell’s ads featuring people named Ronald McDonald enjoying their food. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:27 am by Lisa McElroy
  In other words, the Court considers legal principles in making its decisions, even if applying those principles to the facts means that people who have suffered in situations even more difficult than in the Humphries case cannot get relief. [read post]
8 May 2009, 7:12 am
Young lawyers should have the opportunity to understand transparency v. translucency. [read post]
15 May 2023, 8:07 am by Eugene Volokh
I need to have, he says, some words with you, Seriozhenka. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 11:44 am
So when a Wisconsin state court lets loose with an excellent preemption decision, we figure it's worth taking a look.Blunt involved a claimed defect in a cardiac defibrillator - one of those implanted gadgets that stands by to stabilize heart rhythm (love that word, unique in the English language with more syllables than vowels) in people with chronic heart problems. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 5:54 am by Phil Dixon
Supreme Court has recognized exigent circumstances where the was an imminent threat of harm to people or an imminent threat of destruction of evidence, among others. [read post]
2 May 2016, 4:09 pm by Richard Hunt
HUD is clearly much less interested in helping people obey the law than in punishing people who fail to obey it. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:20 pm by VMaryAbraham
v=A3oIiH7BLmg *************************** See also, The Time Paradox: The New Psychology of Time That Will Change Your Life. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:53 am by SHG
Kagan’s dissent, in other words, is a call for accountability. [read post]