Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 8641 - 8660
of 13,105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2012, 11:20 am
The NJRMA has stated that it is unlikely to petition for rehearing or appeal. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:53 am
See California v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:44 am
Kay v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:10 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that a district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to hear a petition to compel arbitration pursuant to Section 4 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”). [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 5:09 pm
In that case, the Court of Appeals considered the following question on certification by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit: “Under District of Columbia law, does a petition sent to a federal government agency in the District provide a basis for establishing personal jurisdiction over the petitioner when the plaintiff has alleged that the petition fraudulently induced unwarranted government action against the plaintiff? [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 3:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 3:24 pm
United States (11-783),a case that raises interesting questions regarding Brady. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 12:59 pm
If the assertion differs from existing USCIS policy, point out the difference and cite Judulang v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
These petitioning industries - representing more than 80 companies - are spread across 38 states and employ directly tens of thousands of manufacturing workers. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:22 am
United States, 611 F.3d 8, 10 (D.C. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Novartis appealed the Second Circuit’s decision, and in February 2011, the United States Supreme Court denied Novartis’ petition for review. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:30 am
Reding's press conf. on EU #Dataprotection Reform package livestreamed today at 12pm GMT+1 here: ow.ly/8F0S6 #privacy #CPDP2012 # Watch Vivian Reding's Press Conference at the European Commission live here as I will try to live stream it at… http://t.co/whmihIQV # Megaupload takedown reminds us why website terms and conditions can be important http://t.co/LxaQfRc9 # V. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:30 pm
The class named in the suit (Ernest Michael Bakenie v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 10:34 am
If the United States moves the non-Afghan detainees from Parwan, as the article suggests it might, the Government could file a supplemental motion to dismiss the detainees’ petitions on the theory that the district court would then lack a justiciable case or controversy under Article III. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am
Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
In Yee v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:41 pm
As I pointed out in a prior post the 1983 Supreme Court decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:02 pm
v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:13 pm
Concluding that the class claims were not barred as a matter of law, the Bridgeford court relied substantially on the United States Supreme Court decision in Smith v. [read post]
