Search for: "State v. E. E. B." Results 8641 - 8660 of 10,077
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2009, 12:19 pm
I looked at Title V of Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009and found the Private Fund Investment Advisers Registration Act tucked neatly inside. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
We first read Dorsett because it involves one of our bêtes noires, Conte v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 4:40 am by Rob Robinson
Supreme Court hears arguments on the privacy of personal e-mails on work computers - http://bit.ly/6sVCmiPrivilege in Private E-Mail at Work - http://kuex.us/455eSaving E-Discovery Money with Hit by Term Reports http://bit.ly/6F4AGTSeventh Circuit Adopts Set of Principles and Standing Order for Handling E-Discovery - http://kuex.us/456cThe Cost of Silence in a Social World - http://kuex.us/4909The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency:  Spy v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 3:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, CPLR Rule 2220 (b) states that "[s]ervice of an order shall be made by serving a copy of the order. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:44 am by malik11397
As this case presents an issue of first impression, our jurisdiction is pursuant to Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 1-2(b)(1). 1 Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 8:04 pm
A method for managing bulk e-mail distribution comprising the steps: (A) matching a target recipient profile with a group of target recipients; (B) transmitting a set of bulk e-mails to said target recipients in said matched group; (C) calculating a quantity of e-mails in said set of bulk e-mails which have been successfully received by said target recipients; and, (D) if said calculated quantity does not exceed a prescribed minimum quantity of… [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 1:28 pm by Stephen Page
They must also be provided with a signed statement by thelegalpractitioner stating that the advice was given to the party.2.38Item 4 removes the requirement that the original agreement is given to oneofthe spouse parties and a copy be given to each of the otherparties.2.39 Item 3 is a minor technical amendment as a consequence of theproposedrepeal of section 90G(1)(e).2.40 Items 5 – 7 mirror theamendments proposed at items 2 - 4 by applying thesame requirements forspouse… [read post]