Search for: "States v. State"
Results 8641 - 8660
of 258,425
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2023, 8:27 am
And as I pointed out here, disembodied designs are already automatically (and costlessly) protected by copyright as long as they can meet the low standard of creativity mandated by Feist v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:52 am
The Principles therefore form and provide a benchmark by which the courts in Malawi should, in the future, consider whether State (and sometimes non-state) actors comply with their human rights obligations to prevent, prepare for, and respond to pandemics. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:28 am
The following is a guest post from Travis Crum: In Arkansas State Conference of the NAACP v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:20 am
See SpaceX v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:13 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 7:12 am
United States, 481 US 412 (1987). [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 6:24 am
In Arnold v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:23 am
U.S. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
In Wiggins v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Landmark’s Connection to Congress, The Legal History of the Presidential Management Fellows Program, and Hansberry v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
[v] Both Canada[vi] and New Zealand[vii] quickly claimed victory. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 3:59 am
” In Snyder v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
—Ralph Nader 1Kurach v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 2:00 am
The Claremont Canyon Conservancy v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am
Without a doubt, he states, the canons provide for how a bishop is appointed and for how disputes relating to the election of bishops are resolved: “Courts cannot appoint a bishop for the Church. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Donell v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:26 pm
Moyer v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:13 pm
It emphasised the importance of discussion around the State’s monopoly on the use of force, but set that against P. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:05 pm
Petitioner filed his brief in Smith v. [read post]