Search for: "U.S. v. Mark"
Results 8641 - 8660
of 11,355
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Dec 2009, 2:59 pm
Brouda, 544 U.S. 336 (2005), and (2) applying an erroneous standard of proof in determining total loss for sentencing enhancement purposes. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:50 am
— EJS President Eva Paterson joined Nan Aron (Alliance for Justice), U.S. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:12 pm
By Paul Freehling and Scott Schaefers The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals’ December 27, 2010 decision in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 4:21 am
Rumsfeld in 2004, and Hamdan v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:11 pm
In invalidating the “disparagement” section of the Lanham Act in Matal v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 11:22 am
But Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost has filed a direct appeal (not a cert petition; Supreme Court review is mandatory) with the U.S. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:16 pm
* U.S. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 2:37 pm
Plaintiff Brandon Adams alleged that Mark Miller, Greg Sheline, Tyler O. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:03 am
LLC, the U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 3:18 pm
Landmark Copyright case: Thaler v Perlmutter[3] (For an in-depth case review of Thaler v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 11:15 am
U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
Finally, the U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:31 am
Sitz, 496 U.S. 444 (1990). [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 11:00 pm
Former president and left-wing candidate Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva defeated rival Jair Bolsonaro, who had been in office since 2019, marking one of the most astonishing comebacks in political history. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:41 pm
This "proposed amendment" is set for a mark up meeting this week. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 9:04 am
[v] In the sample, there were 16,739 unique word stems in the first claims of the 1905 non-provisionals. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
-Frankfort v. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
-Frankfort v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 11:14 am
V. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 6:20 am
Sullivan, 500 U.S. 173, 186 (1991) (citation and quotation marks omitted).To date, courts have respected the FDA's current preemption positions even when there has actually been an outright reversal of prior views. [read post]
