Search for: "US Constitution Petition"
Results 8641 - 8660
of 12,694
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
While public criticism of the decision, and constitutional arguments against it have been “useful,” progressives need to “move beyond” that and recognize that money in politics is not merely a constitutional problem, but also a political problem, and that there are many potential campaign reforms that would not raise CU-related constitutional concerns. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 6:35 pm
June 30, 2010: ICE Director John Morton issued a Memorandum entitled “Civil Immigration Enforcement: Priorities for the Apprehension, Detention, and Removal of Aliens” articulating ICE’s commitment to prioritizing the use of its enforcement personnel, detention space, and removal resources to promote national security, public safety, and border security—with the removal of aliens who pose a danger to national security or a risk to public safety… [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 10:48 am
It represents a more sensible use of our personal and public resources since education and mentoring strategies are entirely constitution and avoid the protracted legal battles that would accompany new regulations. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 8:54 am
Do illegal alien residents pay the tax (we know the city allows them to sign street-renaming petitions)? [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 3:41 am
According to the report, a group called Protect Our Jobs submitted a petition for a state constitutional amendment guaranteeing the right to collective-bargaining for government and private-sector workers. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:26 am
Here's the cert petition in a case we've been following that presents a question that has divided the lower courts - do the nexus and rough proportionality tests for whether a land use exaction works a taking apply to exactions of cash, or are they limited to land exactions? [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 9:21 am
On the Supreme Court's calendar for its conference this Thursday are cert petitions in two linked cases, Gauss v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Geren Ironically, that constitutional question went wholly unaddressed by the Supreme Court in its 2008 decision in Munaf v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:18 am
This feed is for personal, non-commercial & Newstex use only. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 3:19 pm
Thus, Lodi First should have raised the issue in its first petition for writ of mandate filed against the City because the water supply claims were based on the same conditions and facts in existence when the original writ petition was filed, which it did not do. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 8:27 am
In that case, Padilla sued John Yoo, the Bush administration lawyer who wrote memos used to rationalize American torture of suspected terrorists. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 9:59 am
Some four months ago, lawyers Jonathan Massey and Laurence Tribe filed a provocative petition with the US Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 2:45 pm
The Circuit Court denied petition for review. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:56 pm
§ 2000d et. seq., prohibit LMSD’s race related redistricting actions even though the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution may not.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (3d Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionAmicus brief of Pacific Legal FoundationReply of petitioners (forthcoming) Yang v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:33 pm
On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 1:22 pm
On Petitions for Review of Orders of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
Here's what California's statute protects: (e) As used in this section, “act in furtherance of a person’s right of petition or free speech under the United States or California Constitution in connection with a public issue” includes: (1) any written or oral statement or writing made before a legislative, executive, or judicial proceeding, or any other official proceeding authorized by law, (2) any written or oral statement or writing made in… [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 12:02 am
But that is just an indirect way of saying that use of a transparent proxy for race (lessee status) is permissible and that the only potentially cognizable constitutional injury is the additional and separate leasehold benefit that is explicitly conditioned on an applicant’s race. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
For more info about us, click here. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:41 am
By order dated October 13, 2010 this Court granted the Departmental Disciplinary Committee's petition for an order giving collateral estoppel effect to an April 2006 decision by the U.S. [read post]
