Search for: "US v. Banks" Results 8641 - 8660 of 13,987
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2012, 12:22 pm by Anna Gelpern
In 1986, the Delaware Chancery Court said in Katz v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 11:09 am by D. Kappos
The recent Federal Circuit decision CLS Bank International v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 6:24 am by Victoria VanBuren
Rustam continues to represent several well known Indian corporates, banks, high net worth individuals and their families. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 11:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
But, oddly enough, any such rule would leave corporations entirely free to do what critics of Citizens United and First Nat’l Bank of Boston v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:00 pm by Nietzer
HSH alleged UBS misled it by using credit rating agencies and models to assess the portfolio’s risk that UBS rejected for its own use in addition to engaging in a form of “ratings arbitratge” by selecting securities for the portfolio that were mispriced relative to their ratings, and then used its own superior knowledge to profit from those discrepencies. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 9:39 pm
The owner’s testimony, if believed by a trier of fact, supported reasonable inferences that there was a lack of local franchisee management independence.The decision is Patterson v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 8:56 am by admin
It actually took a US Supreme Court case, US v Tait, to rule that yes, the IRS could tax you globally. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 6:16 am by Gritsforbreakfast
If the state sues in civil court, though, the legal actions are titled things like "State of Texas v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm by Jennifer Simon, Esq.
  The case is captioned as Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:04 am by Josh Wright
Adler, Bernard Petrie Professor of Law and Business and Associate Dean for Information Systems and Technology, New York University School of Law Panel V. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:00 am
Title V and Title VI of the JOBS Act amended Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to raise the threshold for registration under the Exchange Act for companies and banks and bank holding companies from 500 securityholders of record to either 2,000 securityholders of record or 500 securityholders of record who are not accredited investors. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:29 pm
To see an example where taking these precautions worked, see First American Bank of Va. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 10:29 am by Richard Bortnick
Rick In a landmark decision, the First Circuit Court of Appeals held in Patco Construction Company, Inc. v. [read post]