Search for: "United States v. Burden" Results 8641 - 8660 of 9,845
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2010, 1:35 pm by SHG
Specifically, in appointing the Special Master, the New Jersey Supreme Court ordered a review of the legal standard for the admissibility of eyewitness testimony known as the “Manson test,” established by the United States Supreme Court in 1977 and fully embraced by 48 out of 50 states, including New Jersey in 1988 in State v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
Civil Action No. 09-1931 (RMU), No. 12., 13 United States District Court, District of Columbia. [read post]
3 May 2011, 9:16 am by WSLL
Appellant argues that collection of a sales tax on these vehicle transactions also violates the Commerce Clause, Art. 1, § 8, of the United States Constitution. [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 2:06 am
There are instructive parallels, he argues, between the imperialism of "old Europe" (not his phrase) and that of Japan, and of the United States. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 8:48 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Protecting privacy: Beyond the ConstitutionMost legal privacy protections in federal law arise from statutes, not Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, and scholar Erin Murphy has helpfully compiled and analyzed those statutory provisions, noting that "at least four Supreme Court justices recently suggested in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:17 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
United States, a truly landmark case, argued and won by Damon Key attorneys Charlie Bocken and Diane Hastert. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 9:33 am by INFORRM
The United States media, in contrast, has long enjoyed immunity from politicians suing over scrutiny of their public conduct. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 9:03 pm by Matt Danzer
As CDR Mizer explains, “international law does not permit the United States the authority to punish acts against French ships, Iranian oil, Bulgarian nationals, or Malaysian contracts. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:55 pm
Thus, it is argued that the economic benefit gained from outsourcing a said activity will continue to outstrip the increased tax burden, thus not really affecting the process of outsourcing. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 10:07 am by J Eric Lockridge and Katilyn Hollowell
  United States Bankruptcy Judge Marvin Isgur determined that the pipeline agreements were real property covenants because they concerned real property in Oklahoma by burdening and benefitting Alta Mesa’s lease interests; there was privity of estate because the agreements conveyed an easement to Kingfisher to construct and maintain the gas gathering system; and the agreements evidenced an intent to bind the parties’ successors by identifying the agreement… [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:47 am by Brian A. Hall
Following a trial in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the Defendant prevailed. [read post]