Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 8641 - 8660 of 9,863
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm by John Steele
Louisiana, the United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, overturned the presumption announced in Michigan v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 11:42 am
 Obama and the Democrats would deliver the United States. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 4:30 pm by Anita Krishnakumar
It seems to me that in canvassing the United States Code (and its own caselaw) for analogous statutory provisions (and its prior interpretations of those provisions), the Court is looking for a way to maintain consistency across the United States Code. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 7:13 am by Adam Chandler
At the Cato @ Liberty blog, Ilya Shapiro analyzes the Court's action in the Chrysler bankruptcy dispute, Indiana State Police Pension Trust v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 11:11 am by Michael Lowe
The United States Supreme Court is already considering Henry Skinner’s petition for certiorari (09-7784), which he filed after his 1999 petition for writ of habeas corpus with the Amarillo federal district court (Skinner v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 11:20 pm
At the hearing, the DC Circuit opened with its usual cry: "God save the United States and this honorable court. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:37 am
John Elwood at the Volokh Conspiracy adds his take on the continued wait for a decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 5:44 am by Susan Brenner
Dingman, supra (quoting United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Christopher Joyce, National Public Radio, December 7, 2009 The United States has all the tools it needs to replace its old coal energy economy and drastically cut greenhouse emissions. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 6:26 am
In October 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an important decision concerning the extraterritorial application of the U.S. securities laws, Morrison v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 2:52 pm
United States (1997), to be an “inferior officer” within the meaning of the Appointments Clause, the work of the officer must be “supervised and directed at some level by others who were appointed by Presidential nomination with the advice and consent of the Senate. [read post]