Search for: "v. " Results 8641 - 8660 of 493,698
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am by David Aaron
As another sunset of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) Section 702 authorities looms, the House of Representatives has passed a compromise bill, the “Reforming Intelligence and Securing America Act,” H.R. 7888 (RISAA), which the Senate is now considering. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:15 am by Elizabeth M. Manno
Below are some of the current hot topics in patent litigation—and tips for practitioners on both sides of the “v” on how to handle them. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:15 am by Elizabeth M. Manno
Below are some of the current hot topics in patent litigation—and tips for practitioners on both sides of the “v” on how to handle them. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:49 am by Katie Culliton
Supreme Court decision updated the federal religious accommodation test in Groff v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:31 am by Famighetti & Weinick
On April 17, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States issued a decision in the case Muldrow v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division (EEOC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:49 am by Dan Farber
  There have been some striking rulings cutting back on agency power, such as West Virginia v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:39 am by Ann Lipton
This time, it comes in the form of an extraordinary proxy statement recommending that shareholders vote to ratify the compensation package that Chancellor McCormick invalidated in Tornetta v.... [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 6:30 am by ernst
Nicholas Sinanis, Lecturer on the Faculty of Law at Monash University, has published open access Exemplary Damages Practice in Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth-Century England in the American Journal of Legal History:A longer perspective on the modern Anglo-American law of exemplary (or punitive) damages views it as having first begun to emerge after the cases of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood were decided in 1763. [read post]
  In VX v Gemeinde Ummendorf (C-456/22), the CJEU found that there is no de minimis threshold for damage, below which individuals cannot claim for compensation. [read post]