Search for: "*doe, Matter of" Results 8661 - 8680 of 140,186
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2014, 10:55 pm
No matter how local the marijuana growing, Congress could still regulate it. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:05 am by SHG
They’re always John Doe, and the accuser is Jane Doe, no relation. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 10:57 am by Dennis Crouch
Patent No. 8,454,186, a parent of the ’072 patent, [these arguments have] been resolved against Willis as a matter of collateral estoppel. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 11:21 am
This is a continuation of my series on patentable subject matter. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 3:55 pm
If you think that does not matter or is easy to deal with, then I suggest you check out the cohabitation articles on my blog. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 8:16 pm
Nor does Gillespie explain why his  background qualifies him to express opinions on the subject matter of his declaration. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 5:24 am
Second, Art. 9(7) of the Enforcement Directive does not use the word "unjustified". [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
This matter was previously the subject of consideration by this Court in relation to a motion to amend the superior court information. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:03 am by Mike
So what the fuck does it matter that the roommate isn't evil? [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 10:23 am by Kent Scheidegger
The ACLU is among the most reliable contrarian indicators on matters related to constitutional law. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 10:46 am by Tom Smith
For the long-term investor, it doesn’t matter when information hits the market, as long as it does. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 9:00 am by Paula Bremner
Although the case dealt with Abbott’s patent, in fact Abbott does not have an applicable product approved in the US or Canada. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 4:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
If the Court does not follow its own precedent, maybe no one else will either. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 6:00 am by Jon Robinson
  Simply because punitive damages are theoretically available does not mean they are appropriate in any and all cases. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 10:44 am by Carrie Cordero
How, exactly, can a network of government agencies whose work is intentionally supposed to take place behind closed doors, explain what it does and how it does it? [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The subject-matter of claim 1 was therefore purely speculative and defined as a mere statement of the result to be achieved. [read post]