Search for: "Caming v. United States" Results 8661 - 8680 of 9,167
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
  The decision came on a 7-2 vote in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:33 pm
("BWXT"), alleging that it had violated the False Claims Act ("FCA") by defrauding the United States government, in violation of 31 U.S.C. [read post]
17 May 2008, 8:06 am
Those new restrictions were imposed by the Commission measure and the member States implementing it were left with no discretion as to how to apply it (see, Case C-386/96 P Dreyfus v. [read post]
16 May 2008, 12:43 pm
Indeed, in both states a succession of Republican governors in recent years had meant that the high courts of the state were not totally dominated by Democratic appointees. [read post]
16 May 2008, 4:15 am
Newcomer Barilla had become the highest selling brand of pasta in the United States by the early 2000s, which motivated Barilla to seek registration of the subject mark. [read post]
15 May 2008, 9:34 am
We blogged about that proposal shortly after it first came out. [read post]
6 May 2008, 8:56 pm
A few weeks ago I shocked the world -- okay, surprised a few people -- by pointing out United States v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:52 am
Schlesinger made the peculiar remark, to an audience which contained many foreign lawyers, that "making available" has been well established in United States copyright law for over 10 years. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:49 am
"Three almost identical actions have since been filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. [read post]
1 May 2008, 6:34 am
Rowling and Warner Brothers have pushed publishers of other planned Harry Potter reference books in the United States to withdraw them from the market, though without filing suit. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 5:52 am
" (Para. 169.)We had long been aware that the attorney-client privilege skated on thinner ice in Europe than it does in the United States. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 12:29 am
According to Ninth Circuit Blog, the Ninth Circuit “came to its jurisdictional senses” with its amended opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 1:15 pm
Specifically: In circumstances where (i) a non -EU national spouse and her EU national children accompanied an EU national who came to the United Kingdom (ii) the EU national was in the United Kingdom as a worker (iii) the EU national then ceased to be a worker and subsequently left the United Kingdom (iv) the EU national, the non-EU national spouse and children are not self-sufficient and are dependent upon social assistance in the United Kingdom… [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
(Laura Empson of Cass Business School gave a particularly nice presentation on this at lunchtime Thursday, positing that useful ways of thinking about partnership might be as analogous to The Three Musketeers, to Henry V's famous "band of brothers" speech before the Battle of Agincourt, to a buccaneer pirate ship, or, at last, to "Gone With the Wind. [read post]