Search for: "Does 1-35"
Results 8661 - 8680
of 9,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2009, 10:57 am
The employee will pay 35% of the total monthly premium. [read post]
22 May 2009, 8:36 am
It does not have a cap and trade program. [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:31 am
Merits 1. [read post]
20 May 2009, 1:39 pm
Code § 35-38-5-1(f)(3). [read post]
20 May 2009, 10:31 am
Accordingly, claims 1, 9, and 20, and claims 2-8, 1 1 - 19, and 2 1-25 depending therefrom, are unpatentable . . . [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:00 am
Elena Kagan, Solicitor General of the United StatesPanel I9:35 – 10:35 a.m. [read post]
19 May 2009, 8:50 pm
Issues Addressed 1) Spoliation of Evidence and Duty to Preserve Evidence. [read post]
19 May 2009, 8:50 pm
Issues Addressed 1) Spoliation of Evidence and Duty to Preserve Evidence. [read post]
19 May 2009, 5:00 am
" Id. at *35. [read post]
19 May 2009, 2:51 am
The Company is located suburbia, and it does not appeal to everyone.Pro Bono: The Company does not measure hours of pro bono participation. [read post]
18 May 2009, 6:54 pm
The project involves: (1) cutting of severely damaged and downed trees on 12, 859 acres, of which one-third, or 4,845 acres, would involve removal of the cut trees in commercial timber harvest; (2) control of non-native invasive plants on 1,000 acres by digging up and removing them and by selectively applying herbicides; and (3) restoration of 35 woodland ponds that had served as bat habitat before the storm. [read post]
17 May 2009, 8:29 pm
Catlin's claim one reads as follows: 1. [read post]
17 May 2009, 1:26 pm
Ninth Circuit Rule of Appellate Procedure 3(c)(1)(B) does state that the notice must "designate the judgment, order, or part thereof being appealed. [read post]
15 May 2009, 9:56 pm
In my view, the position taken by the defence with regard to this issue has been unrealistic, and their suggested figure of $10,000 under this category of damages does not meet the test of fairness and reasonableness. [read post]
15 May 2009, 5:05 pm
See 67 FR 68785, 68788, n.15. [35] See 68 FR 12622, 12631. [read post]
15 May 2009, 12:44 pm
The following are some of the more noteworthy. 1. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:20 pm
"(1) The Section 2 Report reflects a significant effort by my predecessors and the FTC in collecting and evaluating the opinions and expertise of antitrust enforcement officials from the United States and abroad, leading economists and legal scholars, antitrust practitioners, and representatives of the business community. [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:44 pm
In Pennsylvania, the Uniform Construction Code does not apply to: (8) Alterations to residential buildings which do not make structural changes or changes to means of egress, except as required by ordinances in effect under sections 303(b)(1) or 503 of the act (35 P. [read post]
11 May 2009, 12:42 pm
§ 80a 35(b). [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:13 am
… 35 Mr Timothy Charlton QC on behalf of the defendant submitted that the landscape of anti-suit injunctions had now been changed from the position set out by the Court of Appeal in C v D by the decision of the European Court of Justice in the Front Comor - Case C185/07 ECJ [2009] 1 AER 435. [read post]
