Search for: "Legall v. State" Results 8661 - 8680 of 88,747
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2019, 4:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, the record does not show that plaintiff was incapable of protecting her legal rights despite her mental health diagnosis (see Burgos v City of New York, 294 AD2d 177, 178 [1st Dept 2002]). [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 8:58 pm
Recently on October 10, 2008, Connecticut became the third state to legalize same-sex marriage in Kerrigan v. the State Commissioner of Public Health in which the state Supreme Court struck down a statutory ban by a 4-3 decision. -- This Federalist Society panel will focus on the proper role of the judiciary. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 2:03 pm by Ray Beckerman
In the case targeting students at the State University of New York in Albany, Arista Records v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:48 am by Amy Starnes
— The Texas Tribune Subscribe To keep up on the latest legal news from around the state, sign up for the State Bar of Texas’ Daily News Briefing by clicking here. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm by John Steele
(Is it possible for the largest state bars to force the hand of legal educators?) [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 2:22 pm by Florian Mueller
Acb Is... by Florian MuellerAs for the states' legal argument, it's largely about Section 1 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 3:28 am by Graeme Hall
Modaresi, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ … Court of Appeall: Statutory appeals *must* be on time, as no discretion to extend time under CPR. [read post]
19 Sep 2009, 2:14 pm
This way, eligibility for federal benefits would not differ from state to state. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 10:26 am
A number of entities have continued to weigh in as amici in the Wyeth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 10:05 am by uwlegalscholarship
The University of Iowa College of Law invites submissions for a proposed symposium to mark the 25th anniversary of the United States Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in Batson v. [read post]