Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)" Results 8661 - 8680 of 21,115
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm by Eric Beasley
Tennessee Courts Consider When a Party Can Be Held Liable for an Agent’s Negligence, Tennessee Personal Injury Blog, October 12, 2016. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 9:15 am by Newman, Anzalone & Newman, LLP
Granting the order would mean that, even interpreting all of the disputed issues in the light most favorable to the defendants, the only reasonable interpretation of the facts in this case was that the defendants were liable. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 9:09 am by Neumann Law Group
The trial court granted the defendants motion for summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10) on the plaintiff’s vicarious liability claim on the grounds that (1) there was no genuine issue of material fact that the bouncer was not acting in the scope of employment at the time of the plaintiff’s injury, and (2) even if the bouncer were acting in the scope of employment, since the plaintiff’s theory against… [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 9:04 am by Law Office of Michael D. Maurer, P.A.
The judge granted the defendants’ motions noting an earlier case that was on point. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 8:00 am by Orin Kerr
That is, did the Defendants signs turn the investigators’ entry onto his property into an intrusion subject to constitutional protections? [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
However, they also found that a past ruling by the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg (yes, these newspapers were relying on the wisdom of a European court) meant that in principle making losing defendants liable for success fees and insurance costs could not be justified. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 2:15 pm by Giles Peaker
Mr R’s doctors (GP and consultant) wrote on several occasions to the Defendant setting out the medical risk to Mr R in his present housing. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 7:53 am by Cardone Law Firm
Declaring the policy void would mean that the company never had a valid contract to insure the car and couldn’t be liable for the injured woman’s damages. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 6:24 am by INFORRM
The Court found infringements of the media’s Article 10 rights in two of the three appeals, but nevertheless dismissed each of them. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 12:23 pm by Sharifi Firm, PLC
 Determining whether a defendant breached the duty not to increase the risk requires assessing the defendants conduct, as well as the plaintiff’s injury. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 10:00 am by Brent Wieand
  The manufacturers of defective prescription drugs may be liable for injury victims’ current and anticipated medical bills. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 10:00 am by Brent Wieand
  The manufacturers of defective prescription drugs may be liable for injury victims’ current and anticipated medical bills. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 2:20 pm by Paul Pfeifer
In so holding, the court implicitly rejected the plaintiff’s argument that the defendant company should be liable because it assumed a duty to maintain by entering into the contract with the third party. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 12:15 pm by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
The defendant paid for summer and fall 2012 tuition and Caitlyn was accepted into the Disney college program in Florida. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 12:15 pm by The Law Offices Of Peter Van Aulen
The defendant paid for summer and fall 2012 tuition and Caitlyn was accepted into the Disney college program in Florida. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 7:32 am by Blair & Kim, PLLC
  To succeed in a negligence claim, the plaintiff must show that he or she would not have been injured “but for” the defendants negligence. [read post]