Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 8661 - 8680
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2014, 4:16 am
” In his column for Bloomberg View, Noah Feldman also discussed the significance of the Court’s opinion, arguing that “[t]he decision matters because it signals that the court is moving away from interpreting the law to give government exclusive control over enforcement — and that may possibly hold a clue for the future of securities regulation. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 2:58 am
Further, the GC refers to the trade mark at issue simply as "non-registered mark" -- and all this bring us back to an old, tricky question: shouldn't EU Courts know national law? [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:46 am
That would matter only if the Lanham Act claim actually interfered with the FDA’s regulatory scheme:[T]his greater specificity would matter only if the Lanham Act and the FDCA cannot be implemented in full at the same time.POM, slip op. at 15. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 10:40 am
Reuters columnist, Mark Miller, writes about what many see as a coming brain drain, Wanted: Financial advisers who aren’t about to hang it up. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:20 am
The California vehicle code does not address the matter at all. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 12:55 pm
But symbols, no matter how iconic, cannot be allowed to stand in the way of innovation” (Simon Walker, Britain’s Institute of Directors). [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 12:29 pm
” marks a welcome exception in the academic literature. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 10:26 am
Further factual development was required.Dilution: Defendants correctly pointed out that the marks aren’t famous. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:49 am
It was, if we believe her, a “prior” relationship by a matter of minutes. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
They just haven’t yet. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 9:11 am
It’s bad enough that truck drivers don't leave enough room to brake. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
Aldi argued that confusion wasn’t enough and that deception was required for passing off to succeed. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
It’s a matter of editorial discretion, as Nancy Leong notes. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 1:56 am
The Registrar of Trade Marks referred this opposition matter to the High Court in Pretoria, as the Registrar has been doing of late (reported here). [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 12:24 am
Does it matter to you that Plasti Dip had to settle for the Supplemental Register when it tried to register its similar RUBBER DIP mark for similar coating products? [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 11:00 pm
As a matter of practice, this is often required by the USPTO since ‘Hollywood’ is not a distinctive word. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 3:15 pm
Mark Jones of the Baker Institute thinks outright legalization couldn't happen until at least 2023. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 6:21 am
Turning to matters that don’t involve Guantanamo detainees or Bergdahl, NSA matters continue to percolate. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 5:51 am
On to surveillance matters. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 3:31 am
Well, no self-respecting Kat would willingly admit to not being aware of it in the first place, but that's another matter. [read post]
