Search for: "People v Favors" Results 8661 - 8680 of 11,776
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2011, 11:37 am by Keith A. Davidson
  Seems everyone (well not everyone, but many people) want to bend the rules of properly responding to discovery. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit (Newman, Cabranes and Straub) is not buying this nonsense, and it suspects the DA is changing his story because it realizes that a State Court of Appeals ruling (People v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Tesla's Original eBookMost likely, the court will ask whether the distribution of books in digital form were recognized by knowledgeable people in the publishing industry in 1972. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Tesla's Original eBookMost likely, the court will ask whether the distribution of books in digital form were recognized by knowledgeable people in the publishing industry in 1972. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm by John J. Burke
Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) to revoke the countervailing duty ("CVD") order on pneumatic off-the-road tires from the People’s Republic of China in a case titled GPX International Tire Corporation v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 8:19 am by Eric
The Ninth Circuit, building on its favorable but convoluted ruling in Perfect 10 v. ccBill, wrote a decisive and clear (well, as clear as the 9th Circuit gets...) opinion interpreting the crucial 512(c) safe harbor. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
.) ———————————— Analysis If there is a surprise in the Supreme Court’s agreement to take on the constitutional controversy over the new federal health care law, it is the Court’s willingness to rule on Congress’s power to broadly expand the right of poor people to health care benefits under the federal-state program called “Medicaid.”   In that review, the Court will be… [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 3:03 am by SHG
Applying the law as it existed after Rivera's conviction became final in July 2004, we find that although evidence of “significantly heightened recklessness,” People v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 11:35 am by John Richards
This is sometimes called a “Civil Gideon” rule, which refers to the Supreme Court case of Gideon v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 9:14 am by CJLF Staff
By ruling in favor of the state, Judge Wake denied an injunction requiring the DOC to conform to its established protocol. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" In enacting this law, the City Council may take into account the common-sense view that people doing business with the City are making contributions in order curry favor with policymakers and regulators. [read post]