Search for: "People v Word"
Results 8661 - 8680
of 17,918
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2015, 12:57 am
The word “godless” does not appear in her judgment. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 9:05 pm
Really, I never want to hear one word ever again about Gov. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
The word "rely" was the key operator of Option 2. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 8:02 am
As expected, people are live-tweeting their reading of some interesting bits. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 12:00 pm
Authors select, arrange, and combine formal elements like line, color, notes, words. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am
Chicago school people would disagree b/c the choice to become informed is itself a cost that people choose to bear or not bear.) [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:34 am
In other words, no government can charge a person twice for the same offense. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 3:32 pm
Following the IPKat's blogpost last week on the ongoing passing-off action between Gama Healthcare Ltd v Pal International Ltd. in which Gama objected that Pal's wet-wipe packaging would lead people to think it was theirs, this weblog ran a short, sweet sidebar poll to ask whether readers might be confused between the claimants' Clinell's packs and the defendants' Medipal ones.A gratifyingly large number of readers interrupted their holidays for at… [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 2:07 pm
Doesn’t think we should change Roe v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 10:30 am
This is precisely what Justice Clarence Thomas was criticizing when he wrote for the majority Holder v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 9:11 am
B&B v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 6:25 am
In making this argument, the State relies on McCullen v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
The petitioner was convicted of killing three people, including one who was raped before being killed. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 3:19 pm
From yesterday’s Appellate Court of Illinois decision in People v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:10 pm
The test is an objective one: would the words be understood by reasonable people to refer to the claimant. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 7:45 am
Recently, the Court decided to hear Evenwel v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:06 am
Parks, LLC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
The answer, based on the words of the company’s senior management following the company’s earnings announcement the past week seems to be: at bes t—maybe.* Fifteen million reasons to say "thank you"! [read post]
