Search for: "People v. New" Results 8661 - 8680 of 41,483
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Others have suggested, quite correctly, that the fate of Obamacare now rests in the hands of the people. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:46 am by Susan Brenner
  He began his analysis of the 4th Amendment issues by noting that it guarantees that people shall be `secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 4:45 am by Kevin
Stories about people who legally change their names to something unusual are not new, but they don't really get old, either. [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm by New York Criminal Defense
Recall that we noted in the last post that presumptions may not be invoked where the underlying facts needed to support them are not present (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]). [read post]
28 Feb 2016, 12:14 pm by Donald Thompson
Recall that we noted in the last post that presumptions may not be invoked where the underlying facts needed to support them are not present (see People v Zekaj, 191 AD2d 663 [2nd Dept 1993]; People v Wilt, 105 AD2d 1089 [4th Dept 1984]). [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 10:52 pm by Florian Mueller
As a motion to quash subpoenas shows, the CAF was at some point represented by the Kanter Law Group, the law firm of Jonathan Kanter, who is now the U.S. antitrust chief (official title: Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, DOJ).Let me also report on a new development in the Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:20 pm by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
If Germany Had the Death Penalty: a Thought Experiment April 22 marks the 25th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:39 pm by Michael Lumer
Given the widely held belief in the legal community that a GJ's decision not to indict in cases such as these is usually the result of a rigged or deliberately flawed presentation (see, People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:39 pm by Michael Lumer
Given the widely held belief in the legal community that a GJ's decision not to indict in cases such as these is usually the result of a rigged or deliberately flawed presentation (see, People v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 6:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals agrees with that mootness finding.The case is American Freedom Defense Initiative v. [read post]