Search for: "People v. Polite" Results 8661 - 8680 of 13,790
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2006, 11:22 pm by Anthony Colleluori
Of course the problem is that the political culture of areas that practice this proposal would have to be such that people could in fact decide their fates for themselves. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm by Kashmir Hill & Elie Mystal
Let’s get to it… Elie waxes poetic about the West Coast: LOS ANGELES v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 6:43 pm
Will the citizen (and resident alien, really) v noncitizen distinction continue to apply; and will the territorial v nonterritorial distinction continue to apply in counterterroism legal regimes? [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:41 am by Guest
 What economic and political considerations affect your matter? [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 2:34 pm by Josh Blackman
Occasionally, groups file cross-ideological briefs in which people of opposite political stripes unite to support a specific cause. [read post]
23 Sep 2024, 4:00 am by Administrator
I am re-uploading the episode to fix some audio issues and also to add more context on areas that people had questions about. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 5:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  People have tended to say that there should be some liability regime that applies across the rights. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Even if guns are not agents that themselves kill people, it is beyond argument that people with guns often kill other people and, perhaps as importantly, kill themselves as a means of committing suicide. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 12:03 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  As anyone who has read Dorf on Law in the past few months knows, Sherry was absolutely incensed about the Dobbs decision (overturning Roe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 6:16 am by Jeralyn
The tracking of people’s location constitutes a significant invasion of privacy, which can reveal many things about their lives, such as what friends, doctors, protests, political events, or churches a person may visit. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 9:03 pm by David M. Driesen
In the general workplace case, NFIB v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 5:03 am
What they fail to recognize is that by ignoring the importance of precedence, they are turning the court into a political pendulum, and what they do now is destined to be un-done by the opposite political philosophy when the court, some time in the future, has a different majority with different beliefs. [read post]