Search for: "State v. C. R."
Results 8661 - 8680
of 13,581
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2012, 5:14 am
William C. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 1:55 am
The ECJ’s rulings in the Productores de Música de España (Promusicae) v Telefónica de España SAU (case 275/06) and LSG-Gesellschaft zur Wahrnehmung von Leistungsschutzrechten GmbH v Tele2 Telecommunication GmbH (case C-557/07) confirmed the necessity to balance data protection and IPR under the light of the principle of proportionality, but it did not provide any clear guidance as regards the role of intermediaries in the… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
By Kurt R. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 7:37 am
” A defense of “nominative fair use” is available under paragraph 4(c)(iii), not 4(c)(i). [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 2:05 am
Related PostsApril 5, 2011 -- A, B & C v Ireland: Update (0)January 10, 2011 -- Irish Women Politicians and Abortion: Hope for change after the ECHR ruling (1) [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 12:16 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 7:56 am
Lozano v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:24 am
Paul Husband In June of 2011, the United States Tax Court decided Van Dusen v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:00 am
Justice Emerson declined to follow Bouhayer, stating that it has not been followed by other courts and that it is contrary to the demand-futility test established in Marx v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:32 am
The Ninth Circuit’s decision in the United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 9:42 am
R. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
C 11–00541 CRB, 2012 WL 10546; Estrella v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
Lukaszewski v The District Court in Torun, Pomiechowski v District Court of Legunica, R (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Rozanski v Regional Court 3 Penal Department Poland all concern time limits for appeals in extradition cases and what constitutes ‘good notice of appeal’. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
Carter v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 3:29 am
Like in the Scarlet v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 2:35 am
Catching up on their emails, the IPKat and Merpel have just discovered news of yet another juicy trade mark dispute which the German Bundesgerichtshof has decided to refer to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU): it's Case C-12/12, better known to people who can't even remember easy case numbers as Colloseum Holding AG v Levi Strauss & Co. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:37 am
Disease Burden from Viral Hepatitis A, B, and C in the United States. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:11 am
” See West River Bridge v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 2:39 pm
In a recent post, we covered the Second District Court of Appeals' recent ruling in Jiminez v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 11:07 am
For More Information Bijou v. [read post]
