Search for: "State v. E. F."
Results 8661 - 8680
of 8,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2023, 1:37 pm
The SEC’s Office of Economic Analysis’ 2009 Study on Section 404 states this point more explicitly: “Section 13(b)(2) of the Exchange Act requires companies to maintain effective ICFR, while Section 404 requires management to report on the effectiveness of ICFR. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 7:25 am
More likely the state will do what elites do everywhere--they ignore these engagements and to the extent possible undermine their authors. [read post]
23 Oct 2014, 11:06 am
” In the book, Katagiri notes that “when insurgent groups challenge powerful states, defeat is not always inevitable,” and examines “the circumstances and tactics” that allow non-state actors to succeed “against foreign governments while others fail. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
In 1995 the Court identified state interests that might justify the rules. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 3:05 pm
For the same reason, the PPP will likely attract additional scrutiny from Congressional committees, oversight agencies, state Attorneys General and other regulators. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
These adverse developments have generated a wave of private securities litigation, as well as regulatory inquiries by federal and state authorities. [read post]
9 Aug 2006, 8:22 am
Aunque con esa limitación, "Sánchez" -con Boggiano como único disidente- es la matriz que fraguó por sus fundamentos el fallo unánime de la vÃspera.Eppur si muove: el fallo "Badaro"A partir de 2002, los jubilados sà tuvieron varios aumentos, pero casi todos ellos fueron dados como "sumas fijas" y asignados a los que tenÃan los haberes mÃnimos. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
In 2017, NYDFS was one of the first state financial regulators to impose cybersecurity requirements on covered entities. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 11:59 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 5:06 pm
" It's impossible (I think) to square this with the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Czyzewski v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Hurn v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 3:46 pm
[E]ntering enclosed spaces ordinarily constitutes a search that triggers the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 5:59 pm
E. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
Mexico has just adopted a terrible new copyright law, thanks to pressure from the United States (and specifically from the copyright maximalists that hold outsized influence on US foreign policy). [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
In January of 2000, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Weeks v. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 6:38 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
The Board went on: “However, this does not mean that i f R 64 (a) is not or not correctly met then A 107 first sentence will necessarily not be complied with” (idem). [read post]
