Search for: "State v. Save"
Results 8661 - 8680
of 11,766
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2011, 10:24 am
Private Prisons Found to Offer Little in Savings As states scramble for quick ways to mend broken budgets, prison privatization is increasingly a part of the conversation. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:04 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 4:30 am
Tuttle v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 6:24 pm
Share/Save [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:47 pm
In Gilbert v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:15 am
., et. al. v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 5:53 am
One upside for the state will be incarceration cost savings – if we assume that each prisoner costs about $50,000/year to incarcerate – a relatively modest estimate – then this means a cost savings of 1.6 billion dollars annually to the state. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:53 am
In State v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 3:13 am
The Supreme Court, in Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:00 pm
Famous examples are R v Director of Public Prosecutions, Ex p Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326 , R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 AC 410 and Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30. [read post]
23 May 2011, 11:18 am
Finally, the wife testified that, while she used to save $600 per month, since the divorce she can only afford to save $275 per month, and that she has accumulated $8,600 in credit card debt due to their son's college expenses. [read post]
ACLU Lens: Supreme Court Orders California to Reduce its Prison Population to Alleviate Overcrowding
23 May 2011, 10:47 am
The decision in Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:45 am
Plata (formerly Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
22 May 2011, 10:20 pm
(Orin Kerr) Interesting facts from State v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 6:13 pm
The case cite is Ezell’s Fried Chicken, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 10:19 am
(Orin Kerr) The Eleventh Circuit has handed down a new en banc decision, Gilbert v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:43 am
In fact, Richard could’ve saved himself some trouble by calling me. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:34 pm
United States. [read post]
19 May 2011, 8:01 am
S213(3) states that the Court must make an order either returning the deposit or that it be paid to the custodial scheme while section 214(4) states that the court must also order payment of three times the deposit to the tenant. [read post]
