Search for: "United States v. California" Results 8661 - 8680 of 13,840
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2012, 11:47 am by Bart Torvik
United States, the Supreme Court was constantly reviewing pornography to determine whether it was "obscene" and therefore beyond the First Amendment's protection. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 5:41 am by Susan Brenner
” As Wikipedia also notes, defamation law in the United States “is much less plaintiff-friendly than its counterparts in European and the Commonwealth countries”, due to the influence of the 1st Amendment. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
A different district court followed suit and stated that Section 106 should be read literally to create an independent, exclusive right “to authorize” use of a copyrighted work.14 That court held that “mere authorization . . . constitutes direct infringement and is actionable under United States Copyright Law. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 10:47 am
That year the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Troxel v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 7:16 am by J. Gordon Hylton
This means that both Alaska and California would have the same one vote, and 26 votes would be necessary to elect a president. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 12:47 pm by Michael Dimino
Kyllo to be a search), but the analogy fails because of the limited information dog sniffs reveal.  In past cases, notably United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 11:42 am by Kevin
As you can see, John has a talent that has not been dampened by Sandy, and it also refuses to be completely buried even under the weight of unfortunately necessary sentences like this one: The petition argues that the lower court’s decision conflicts with the “curtilage” rule from United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am by Kiran Bhat
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., the Court considered whether copyrighted works made and purchased abroad can be bought and sold within the United States without the copyright owner’s permission. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:39 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
Twitter introduced a “country-withheld content” policy last January, stating that: “[m]any countries, including the United States, have laws that may apply to Tweets and/or Twitter account content. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 5:13 am by SHG
United States, 293 F. 1013 [1923]), held that Ofshe's theories have not gained "general acceptance in the scientific community," and refused to allow him to testify for the defense. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:52 pm by Florian Mueller
Three weeks ago I reported on Oracle's notice of appeal of the final ruling of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in the Java-Android intellectual property dispute. [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 1:01 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Thyseen-Borne Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation.Before he died, Cassirer filed a lawsuit in 2005 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California for the return of a painting titled “Rue Saint-Honoré, Afternoon, Rain Effect. [read post]
Houston, of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California, held that borrowers are not intended third-party beneficiaries of the Servicer Participation Agreement and, therefore, lack standing to sue for an alleged breach of the agreement.Benito v. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 3:40 pm by Kent Scheidegger
) - Sutter County District Attorney and California District Attorneys Association (CDAA) President Carl V. [read post]