Search for: "United States v. Robert" Results 8661 - 8680 of 9,863
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2009, 4:43 am by Broc Romanek
Respondents' Argument US Solicitor General Elena Kagan argued the case for the United States, which previously intervened in the case. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 12:38 pm by Sheppard Mullin
Lash Group Inc., 9th Cir., No. 08-35619, Nov. 18, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit took a dramatic step towards preserving the rights of False Claims Act (FCA) defendants. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 7:53 am
There is little prospect that state execution is in any imminent constitutional danger, because it is unlikely that a Supreme Court of John Roberts Jr., Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito Jr. will soon acknowledge the failure of the Gregg v. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 11:30 pm
Circuit to dispense with the court's usual opening cry-- "God save the United States and this Honorable Court" prior to appellate arguments in the case. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
United States and Black v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:07 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  Javaid Iqball and other detainees filed suit in the United States District Court in New York City against former U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn
  He claims the objectionable government action was the issuance of a warrant; a warrant Ord claims was obtained by the police in bad faith.This spring (March 2010), the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a gun-ordinance case from Illinois, McDonald -v- Chicago. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 9:50 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
  He claims the objectionable government action was the issuance of a warrant; a warrant Ord claims was obtained by the police in bad faith.This spring (March 2010), the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument on a gun-ordinance case from Illinois, McDonald -v- Chicago. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 8:17 am
In anticipation of the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 5:49 am by Howard | Nassiri, PC
United States, No. 08-1119, pits a Minnesota law firm against multiple provisions of the federal bankruptcy reform laws of 2005. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:18 am
The Case against Consolidation       United States antitrust law aims to eliminate transactions that threaten the competitive process. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 12:35 am by Mark Murakami
He noted that the decision relied on "spurious historical assumptions," contemporaneous common law from England and the United States, and disregarded settled U.S. [read post]