Search for: "Wells v. Wells" Results 8661 - 8680 of 97,154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2014, 9:15 am
 It's for the judiciary to say whether "arguable but unmeritorious" issues should be raised, as well as to interpret what we exactly mean by that.And that's exactly what the California Supreme Court should do. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:00 am
 That may well be illegal.But it's only illegal if it's willful, and, geeze, I'm just at a total loss to explain to a nonlawyer -- or even a lawyer! [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 12:13 pm
 As well as some practical advice from the Court of Appeal about that same rule. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 1:35 pm
  Seems to me like he may well have been having incredibly serious mental problems.But the trial court thought he was faking it. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 1:46 pm
., pointing towards the gap) was 17 miles per hour.The oral argument in this case was on March 31, 2020; admittedly before the killing of George Floyd, but the resulting uproar about police tactics might well have led the plaintiffs to think:  "Hey, given the facts, we've got a real chance at winning here, right? [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 1:09 pm
  That's how the opinion reads, as well as a press release from the DA's office at the time. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 12:08 pm
 But here, the trial court lets defendant plead guilty to a misdemeanor -- although the prosecution, which had filed felony charges, opposes such relief -- because if he pleads guilty to a felony, under his contract with Subway, he may well lose his Subway stores.God forbid we should deprive you of the instrumentality of your crimes, eh? [read post]
9 May 2018, 12:15 pm
  And when you're already in the triple digit page numbers and you've still got twenty-some single-spaced pages to read; well, you're pretty much exhausted.Not surprisingly, the opinion's very comprehensive. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:50 pm
He told Doe to wear different colored wigs every night, as well as revealing clothing, and high heel shoes. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 1:07 pm
 Fair enough, and I am more than happy with such a result.But as for whether it's a breach of Dish's contract with Fox -- well, I gotta say, it seems to me like it pretty much is.You can read the provisions of the various contracts in the opinion. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 12:16 pm
  This holding conflicts with a 1991 decision of the Court of Appeal in a case called Gilman, but is consisted with a different case (Stallman) decided that same year as well as a subsequent decision (Johnson).In my view, it's more than about time for the California Supreme Court to definitively resolve this two-decade old split. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 11:24 am
 Who, according to his firm bio, "has over 20 years family law experience," as well as a ton of accolades in the area. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 12:54 pm
Appellants thus miss the point that they have the duty on appeal to state the evidence fairly, in the light most favorable to the trial court’s ruling, and record citations are for the benefit of the reviewing court as well as the respondent. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 1:25 pm
  You strongly suspect that you die if you stay in the car (correctly, as it turns out) versus knowing full well (again, correctly) that you'll be seriously injured if you throw yourself from a moving vehicle at 100 miles per hour (or whatever).How horrible. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:04 pm
  As well as an ironic one.Defendant files the appeal to get out of a $300 restitution fine, claiming he has no ability to pay. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:18 pm
Members of this Court not among today’s dissenters have volunteered for service in the active military or the National Guard (the modern “well regulated Militia”) and bore arms during that service. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:45 am
One of the great things about reading appellate opinions is that you often see things you've never, ever seen before.Like in this one.I've read plenty of cases involving custodial (as well as non-custodial) interrogations. [read post]