Search for: "York v York"
Results 8661 - 8680
of 51,499
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2020, 12:21 pm
New York. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:36 am
See Samson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 6:27 am
New York Power Authority, a summary order issued on December 8. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
Illinois Republican Party v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 3:29 am
Just look at Shelby County v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 1:48 pm
By allowing no inquiry into any conduct preceding the demonstration except to identify “actual participants,” the Board disallowed highly relevant inquiry into identification of those deserving of discipline (Time Warner Cable of New York City LLC v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 12:02 pm
Another older case found in my year-end roundup.Pilla v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 7:43 am
The parties in Petersen v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 7:20 am
(Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 6:41 am
In February 2020, the New York Court of Appeals Waldemar Biaca-Neto et al. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 6:29 am
City of New York, 72 F.3d 1040 (2d Cir. 1995). [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 6:19 am
The trial court in Hedges v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 6:19 am
The trial court in Hedges v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, the Appellate Division opined that the Fund met its burden of showing a possibility that disclosure of [such] names could endanger the lives or safety of police retirees, as required to exempt them from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(f)". [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Bellamy v New York City Police Dept., 87 AD3d 874, the Appellate Division opined that the Fund met its burden of showing a possibility that disclosure of [such] names could endanger the lives or safety of police retirees, as required to exempt them from disclosure pursuant to Public Officers Law §87(2)(f)". [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 3:33 am
The Company Yehle and Rich formed Wellesley Island Storage LLC (the “Company”) as equal 50% members to construct and operate a storage unit facility in the Thousand Islands region of New York. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 7:09 pm
Viewing the statute as primarily directed at cost regulation, Sotomayor can dispose of those challenges easily, referring to an earlier decision (New York State Conference v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 10:29 am
In its 2014 decision in Halliburton v. [read post]
12 Dec 2020, 10:59 am
“The claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress was correctly dismissed because defendants’ conduct as alleged in the complaint was not “so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency, and to be regarded as atrocious, and utterly intolerable in a civilized community” (Howell v New York Post Co., 81 NY2d 115, 122 [1993] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:59 pm
United StatesWASHLITE v. [read post]
