Search for: "AMP, INC. v. United States" Results 8681 - 8700 of 11,013
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Nov 2009, 2:04 pm by Anna Christensen
On Tuesday, December 1, in United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 9:07 pm
§ 1071(b)(1) seeking judicial review of the TTAB's March 2009 decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 6:00 pm
(IP Osgoode) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions 9th Circuit remands cybersquatting case to Western District: Lahoti v Vericheck (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:12 pm by Paralegal Mentor
Jenkins, 491 U.S. 274 (1989), the United States Supreme Court held that in setting a reasonable attorney’s fee under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:05 pm by Erin Miller
Case(s) in which the Solicitor General has recently filed a brief for the United States, as directed by the Court: Docket: 08-1191 Title: Morrison v. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 6:58 am by WIMS
As the two largest consumers and producers of energy, there can be no solution to this challenge without the efforts of both China and the United States. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 6:45 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG)   United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:28 pm
(Patently-O) (The 271 Patent Blog) (IP Factor) (Patently BIOtech) (The Invent Blog) Ebay terms upheld - forum selection clause: Tricome v Ebay (IPblog) Data breach notifications one step closer to law... again (Ars Technica) US General - Lawsuits and strategic steps Starbucks - Starbucks data breach plaintiffs try their luck in the 9th Circuit: Krottner v Starbucks (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Bilski - Supreme Court hears… [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:28 pm
(Patently-O) (The 271 Patent Blog) (IP Factor) (Patently BIOtech) (The Invent Blog) Ebay terms upheld – forum selection clause: Tricome v Ebay (IPblog) Data breach notifications one step closer to law... again (Ars Technica)   US General – Lawsuits and strategic steps Starbucks - Starbucks data breach plaintiffs try their luck in the 9th Circuit: Krottner v Starbucks (Technology & Marketing Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic… [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 1:28 pm
(Patently-O) (The 271 Patent Blog) (IP Factor) (Patently BIOtech) (The Invent Blog) Ebay terms upheld - forum selection clause: Tricome v Ebay (IPblog) Data breach notifications one step closer to law... again (Ars Technica) US General - Lawsuits and strategic steps Starbucks - Starbucks data breach plaintiffs try their luck in the 9th Circuit: Krottner v Starbucks (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Bilski - Supreme Court hears… [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 11:11 am by Karen Denvir
As a result, the Uhms had to pay out-of-pocket for their prescription medications.A little over a month after their benefits were supposed to begin, the Uhms filed a class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington against Humana Health Plan, Inc., and its parent company, Humana Inc., (“Humana”) entitled Uhm v. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 6:33 am
” Pfizer Inc. has announced it will close its $300 million R&D headquarters in New London, Connecticut. [read post]