Search for: "Cost v. Cost" Results 8681 - 8700 of 48,945
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2011, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
  Yes, the exclusionary rule does impose costs, but the problem is that only the costs are visible. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"* The Appellate Division dismissed both Article 78 actions "on the merits," without costs or disbursements. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"* The Appellate Division dismissed both Article 78 actions "on the merits," without costs or disbursements. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 6:01 am by Daniel Shaviro
This, in turn, could unleash tax sheltering that might cost the federal government billions of dollars in revenue, most or all of it from the upper income brackets. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
Defenders of the administration’s position in King v. [read post]
23 Jul 2016, 8:53 am by Associates and Bruce L. Scheiner
Plaintiff sought $70,000 in damages for future therapy costs as well as damages for pain and suffering. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 4:46 pm
The Second District Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal today in Peterson v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:32 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Medical Malpractice Opinions Body: SC18572 - Pin v. [read post]
22 May 2007, 6:55 am
Readers of this blog know that I have argued the continued existence of Roe v. [read post]