Search for: "J Thomas" Results 8681 - 8700 of 8,891
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
S. 220, 317-318 (2005) (THOMAS, J., dissenting in part). [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:00 pm
S. 220, 317-318 (2005) (THOMAS, J., dissenting in part). [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 5:15 am
Markese  $ 36,000   $ 61,444      $ 97,444 Thomas F. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 12:02 am
Faculty: David Fishel, Senior Director, Technology Counsel , Nexidia ESI, Clawbacks, Cost Shifting and Disclosure: Understanding the Impact of Amended FRCP Rule 26 Thursday, 03 May, 2007 Faculty: Timothy J. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 8:58 am
In today's LA Times, David J. [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 4:32 am
"'Supreme Discomfort' leaves Clarence Thomas as an open case": Today in The Los Angeles Times, Pulitzer Prize-winning historian David J. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 10:05 am by Bridget
This article appeared in the New York Times on April 20, 2007:After Falsified Test Results, Kelly Orders Forensic ShakeupBy Thomas J. [read post]
20 Apr 2007, 6:29 am
Thomas, 304 F.3d at 582 (questioning whether verbally ordering the tenants to leave and escorting them out was a seizure of the residence where the officers did not take physical possession of the property) (Gilman, J., writing for the court on this point separately from the lead opinion). [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:47 pm
Stenberg, 505 U.S. at 1019-20 (Thomas, J., joined by Rehnquist, C.J. and Scalia, J. dissenting). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 10:30 pm
Law students enrolled in a "substantive" criminal procedure course frequently sweat over the intricacies of search and seizure law within contexts familiar to the average land-lubber attorney - the home, the automobile, and the person strolling down the street. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:45 am
S. 914, 980-983 (2000) (THOMAS, J., dissenting). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:23 am
S. 914, 980-983 (2000) (Thomas, J., dissenting). [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 2:58 am
See Casey, supra, at 979 (SCALIA, J., concurring in judgment in part and dissenting in part); Stenberg v. [read post]