Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 8681 - 8700
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2014, 3:29 pm
"Specifically, the government is destroying content gathered through tapping into the fiberoptic cables of AT&T. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:00 am
” “[T]rademark rights do not entitle the owner to quash an unauthorized use of the mark by another who is communicating ideas or expressing points of view. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 4:34 am
Derivative Litigation, 698 A.2d 959 (Del.Ch. 1996), as a general matter “a director’s obligation includes a duty to attempt in good faith to assure that a corporate information and reporting system, which the board concludes is adequate, exists, and that the failure to do so in some circumstances, may, in theory, at least render a director liable for losses caused by non-compliance with applicable legal standards. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
Parrillo’s answer: Money matters. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 9:45 am
It doesn’t matter who the owner is because the question is whether anyone is confused and clearly, here, no one would be. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
The Fourth Amendment doesn’t work that way. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 2:54 am
At the time, you couldn't avoid it for performance reasons. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 4:37 pm
These kinds of local crimes are considered quintessentially state matters. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 8:44 am
According to the UK IPO, a series of marks “means a number of trade marks which resemble each other as to their material particulars and differ only as a matter of non distinctive character which would not affect the identity of the trade mark”. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm
On the other hand, the letter does direct Zazzle "to CEASE AND DESIST ALL COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT," and surely he wouldn't have used all caps unless he thought this was really a serious matter. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 11:00 am
[Afro Leo wonders: To start with, isn't Nollywood now in the dictionary? [read post]
31 May 2014, 1:00 pm
I can't discuss them all here, but the list is impressive, though impressive lists don't always guarantee spot-on amicus briefs, as Oracle v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 11:41 am
The white markings are called “chrome” in horseracing. [read post]
29 May 2014, 3:22 pm
You aren’t wearing yours, mom. [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:16 pm
At least that’s the lesson from attorney Mark Poniatowski, who recently beefed up his LinkedIn profile leading to referrals worth $12,000. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:22 am
Or is it just a matter of cultural tradition? [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:24 am
The Directive charges Member States with "encouraging" users, but doesn't explain what that means and it doesn't appear to embrace better information about choices available to prospective users. [read post]
28 May 2014, 10:48 pm
This is my issue, and it’s not solely a matter of whose ox is being gored, believe me — I have little use for eco-hippies and bicycling polar bears. [read post]
28 May 2014, 1:44 pm
But that goes out the window—to the detriment of defense and prosecution alike—if classified documents must be handed over as an initial matter, unredacted. [read post]
28 May 2014, 1:36 pm
At least that’s the lesson from attorney Mark Poniatowski, who recently beefed up his LinkedIn profile leading to referrals worth $12,000. [read post]
