Search for: "People v. House" Results 8681 - 8700 of 12,876
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm by Fiona de Londras
In this case the applicants had failed before the House of Lords in arguing a violation of their rights for the failure to respond adequately to complaints made to child protection services about the serious neglect and abuse that they was suffering in their home (X and Others v Bedfordshire County Council [1995] 3 All ER 353). [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 12:59 pm by Ilya Somin
Yesterday, the House of Representatives passed the Respect for Marriage Act. [read post]
In the House of Lords, the Chagos Islands case (R (Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2008] UKHL 61) because of the historical constitutional and international legal interest and its continuing ramifications which one follows both internationally and actually domestically. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court issued its unanimous decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 2:28 am by Orin S. Kerr
  This holding conflicts with a recent ruling of the Colorado Supreme Court, People v. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 3:34 pm by Sinead Ring
This  clarification of the Castle Doctrine is most welcome, since under the common law, (most recently outlined People (DPP) v Barnes) the position is not clear (see my previous blog). [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 6:17 am
And as also posted, the question of what rights the Constitution affords Gitmo detainees is at issue in Boumediene v. [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 6:14 am by Jacquelyn Greene
However, the Court of Appeals held that the North Carolina Industrial Commission had the authority to issue a court order for the release of juvenile records in Jane Doe v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 10:11 pm
Richardson v Midland Heart Limited High Court (Chancery) 12/11/2007, unreported, concerned a shared ownership lease taken out in 1995. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:12 am by hjabbar
When trying to buy a house, people in this situation may be denied credit when in fact their creditworthiness is excellent. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 1:20 pm by NL
One legacy of these arrangements was Kay v Lambeth and Kay v UK, cases which have defined the application of human rights law to people losing their homes. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 5:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
For some of these people, losing their job also means losing their home. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 4:30 am by charonqc
The Government has also dropped proposals to phase out the right of hereditary peers to sit in the House of Lords. [read post]
31 May 2018, 5:11 am by Kevin
” As you may recall if you’re not a government official, the Fourth Amendment guarantees “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures …. [read post]