Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8681 - 8700
of 13,840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2012, 10:34 am
In 1962, for example, in NLRB v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
The Supreme Court rejected this argument, saying, “the mere fact that a copyright is property derived from a grant by the United States is insufficient to support the claim of exemption.” To be exempt from state taxation, the government must reserve some sort of controlling interest in a grant or privilege. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 8:08 am
” As support, it then stated, “In Fox Film Corp. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2012, 1:54 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office has good news for Samsung, and Samsung has already shared it with Judge Koh in a late-night filing. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 1:50 pm
Earlier today, in United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 1:23 pm
Apple is the sole defendant in the lawsuit; neither AT&T Mobility, nor any related business units at the telecom was named a party. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 3:21 am
K 3258 S88 2012 Models of religious freedom : Switzerland, the United States, and Syria by analytical, methodological, and eclectic representation. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
United States, Ms. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:01 pm
United States, Ms. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
Johnson (2008), United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
Johnson (2008), United States v. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
It went to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Oct 2012, 11:18 am
That the medical marijuana laws of the State of California, created both by the voters of California and the elected representatives of the State of California, are routinely ignored by the unelected law enforcement officers of the State of California is not really the focus of this blog article, however. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 7:12 pm
Under the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Faragher v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 2:32 pm
’” She noted that the United States Supreme Court held in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 10:02 am
’” Summit Bank v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 9:25 am
United States, the Second Circuit concluded that laws discriminating against gays and lesbians were subject to "heightened" or "intermediate scrutiny" under the Constitution. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:49 am
The most recent such case is the Third District’s published decision in Voices for Rural Living v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 11:49 am
“The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
