Search for: "United States v. Doe" Results 8681 - 8700 of 44,321
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2020, 7:20 am by Cameron Kerry, John B Morris, Jr.
Editor’s Note: This article is part of a three-part Lawfare series on how to address federal privacy legislation in the United States. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
If they cannot even be roused to say something when the President of the United States abuses his powers to violently stop citizens from exercising their First Amendment rights, why would they say anything to warn Trump not to shred the rest of the Constitution? [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
§ 546, provides that “the Attorney General may appoint a United States attorney for the district in which the office of United States attorney is vacant,” so long as the person appointed by the AG is not someone whom the President has tried to appoint as U.S. attorney but whom the Senate has “refused” to confirm, and so long as the AG’s appointment does not last more than “120 days. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 1:43 pm by Sandy Levinson
  And does “originalism” offer the slightest help in answering that question? [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 7:30 am by Ilya Somin
As bad as the Kelo experience was for the victims, it did bolster the cause of property rights in the United States, and to some extent, even around the world. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
Take the case of a biomedical engineer, Mark, who earns $325,000 (taxable income) annually and is married to Casey, who does not work outside the home. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:01 am by Guest Blogger
For example, in 2017, the CERD stated it was “deeply concerned” that “[v]iolations of the land rights of indigenous peoples continue” and that “[c]ostly, time-consuming and ineffective litigation is often the only remedy, in place of seeking free, prior and informed consent — resulting in the State party continuing to issue permits which allow for damage to lands. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 2:52 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
USCIS acknowledges in the new memorandum that “neither statutes nor regulations state the maximum allowable time of non-productive status. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 2:52 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
USCIS acknowledges in the new memorandum that “neither statutes nor regulations state the maximum allowable time of non-productive status. [read post]
On January 9, 2019, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa declared this law unconstitutional in Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 8:51 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
United States, 509 U.S. 544, 550, 113 S.Ct. 2766, 125 L.Ed.2d 441 (1993), quoting M. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:31 am by JB
This reading makes particular sense given the textual connections between The Preamble, Article I, section 18, Article II, Article III, section 2, Article V, Article VI, and Article VII.According to Article VII, until the Constitution is ratified by nine states, it does not come into effect. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Commenting on the Supreme Court’s controversial rulings on the extent to which the Constitution applied in the territories the United States acquired in the wake of the Spanish-American War, Finley Peter Dunne famously had his character Mr. [read post]