Search for: "United States v. Good" Results 8681 - 8700 of 21,078
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2015, 3:38 pm
  The Ninth Circuit swung mightily and missed with McClellan v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:08 am by Peter Margulies
The Fiscal Year 2017 Intelligence Reauthorization Act would hamper the PCLOB’s performance of its watchdog role, by expressly confining PCLOB oversight to the “privacy and civil liberties of United States persons. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 10:19 am by Ilya Somin
I hope a future Supreme Court decision will eventually overrule or at least severely limit Trump v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 6:43 am
They’re also obviously at risk of simply describing, in a laudatory manner, characteristics of the goods or services in question.CJEU Cases C-398/08 P Audi AG v OHIM (VORSPRUNG DURCH TECHNIK) and C-311/11 P Smart Technologies ULC v OHIM (WIR MACHEN DAS BESONDERE EINFACH), already blogged by Jeremy hereand here, set out the position in Europe. [read post]
15 Jul 2017, 5:11 am
The summary stated that the Supreme Court allows Eli Lilly's appeal and holds that Actavis' products directly infringe Eli Lilly's patent in the United Kingdom, France, Italy and Spain. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 4:24 pm
United States and amending the US countervailing duty law to expressly apply to imports from "non-market economies" like China and Vietnam. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 7:45 pm
Acting Deputy Solicitor General, Leondra Kruger on behalf of the United States, faced similar questioning from Alito: [W]hat is the employer supposed to do . . . . [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:00 am by Amy Howe
United States, holding that the pretrial restraint of a criminal defendant’s untainted asset violates the Sixth Amendment, concluding that “what seems on its face like a clear rule may prove challenging for courts to apply in practice. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
United States, in which the justices held that a defendant who pleads guilty in a plea deal can benefit from later changes in the sentencing guidelines so long as the district court relied on the guideline range in imposing the sentence or accepting the agreement. [read post]