Search for: "United States v. Washington"
Results 8681 - 8700
of 10,170
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2022, 7:23 pm
Qualified Immunity In 1989, the United States Supreme Court in Graham v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
”[15] The purpose of a restatement is to clarify “the underlying principles of the common law” that have “become obscured by the ever-growing mass of decisions in the many different jurisdictions, state and federal, within the United States. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm
Stevens and United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 9:05 pm
Appointments to these positions are tracked by the Partnership For Public Service in conjunction with the Washington Post. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:16 am
Qualifications: Applicants must be United States citizens and enrolled in law school at the time of the internship. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 5:17 am
By contrast, the Judicial Conference of the United States, which is principally responsible for making policies for the administration of federal courts, has generally moved in the opposite direction from the states. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am
Question: In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
– FIFA IP victories (Afro-IP) Switzerland Heineken versus Keineken: trade mark parody in the Alps (Class 46) Syria Syria recognises unregistered trademarks (The IP Factor) Tanzania S26 baby food scare – possibly counterfeits (Afro-IP) United Kingdom Article in The Times regarding James Joyce’s heir’s agreement to new budget edition of Ulysses – revived copyright (1709 Copyright Blog) UK IPO:… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v… [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 10:19 am
United States. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
: the failure of safe drinking waterenforcement in the United States. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:50 am
A panel of experts will offer perspectives from Southeast Asia, Europe, India and Japan on the ways the United States and its allies can push against China’s activities. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 1:31 pm
” Sivaraman v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
8 Oct 2023, 9:39 pm
” Etc.In the 1969 case of Powell v. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 12:05 pm
Qualifications: Applicants must be United States citizens and enrolled in law school at the time of the internship. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 9:26 am
V. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:39 pm
Workshop on May 26 to Explore the Intersection of Patent Policy and Competition Policy and its Implications for Promoting Innovation James Madison Building, USPTO Campus WASHINGTON (May 10, 2010) – The Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and the Department of Commerce’s United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced today that they will hold a joint public workshop on the intersection of patent policy and competition policy… [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Such calls are not limited to the United States. [read post]
11 May 2020, 9:01 pm
United States, Justice Elena Kagan hardly vindicated the erstwhile officials. [read post]