Search for: "Waites v. State" Results 8681 - 8700 of 12,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2007, 2:59 pm
Supreme Court grants certiorari in District of Columbia v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:51 am by joseph bahgat
For what it's worth, the scope of review in New Jersey is consistent with the federal standard, and the standards held by most states, as restated recently in State v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 7:16 am by Joy Waltemath
A disclaimer at the bottom of the order screen stating the delivery fee is not a tip and encouraging customers to “reward your driver for awesomeness” may not have been enough to satisfy the mandates of the state’s Tip Act (Carpaneda v Domino’s Pizza, Inc, January 9, 2014, Young, W). [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 1:15 am
A lot of states are just waiting and seeing how that process unfolds. [read post]
28 May 2009, 2:26 am
 And the SEC took us up on that offer in the  recent AFSCME v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:46 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The government and the state disagreed explicitly on whether a prior Supeme Court ruling, in the 1984 case of South Carolina v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 4:56 pm
For an interesting discussion of the issue, which expresses some sympathy to those who warn their family members, see United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 2:34 pm by FDABlog HPM
  Senator Kohl stated that the changes are necessary to permit long-term care patients in chronic and debilitating pain access to schedule II substances much faster than waiting for the written prescription of a practitioner: Waiting serves only to deny the patient more immediate access to much needed pain medication. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by Ryan Goodman
” Indeed, Pomerantz may even mean federal crimes, and not the state crimes that the DA’s Office was investigating. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 11:41 am
Before the oral arguments yesterday in The Protestant Episcopal Church in the Diocese of South Carolina v. [read post]
7 Aug 2010, 7:46 pm by Rick
  I was waiting, under the erroneous assumption that someone would address this important issue without provocation. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 11:02 am by Scott R. Anderson, Molly E. Reynolds
§§ 1541-48) to the Supreme Court’s 1983 opinion in INS v. [read post]