Search for: "Weeks v. Weeks" Results 8681 - 8700 of 66,978
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Dec 2016, 8:11 am by Simran Bakshi
This decision does not however appear to have been applied or followed by the Courts thereafter, and in fact was expressly rejected in the more 2016 case of Michalski v Cima Canada Inc.] [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 5:00 am by Gregory Dell
A position described as light, Hampton was required to work forty hours per week, five days a week and was frequently asked to perform the following duties, all of which were documented in his job description. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 3:14 pm by Jordan Brunner
This prevents Bormann from discussing the records with her client, which goes against “one of the most fundamental aspects” of Skipper v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
This week's summaries are in Natural justice, Government pensions, Testifying in niqab, Definition of disability, & Right to counsel: R. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am by John Elwood
”  Three of last week’s habeas relists are likely back for another go-‘round:  Marshall v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:46 am
This week Natasha and I discuss the following family law news items: the government's proposed legal aid reforms; LB Richmond v B & W & B & CB, in which the High Court considered the use of hair testing as evidence of alcohol consumption; Hong Kong’s Supreme Court upholds principle of equal division on divorce; and the case of W (A Minor).You can listen to the LoreCast here. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 3:35 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At crImmigration, César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández discusses last week’s grant in the immigration case Mata v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm by Simon Gibbs
The first have suddenly been trying to accept defendants' offers on costs that a couple of weeks ago apparently held no attraction. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 10:43 pm by cdw
This  week’s edition is now available: The Supreme Court’s holding in Albert Holland v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 2:38 pm
in an unanimous opinion authored by Justice Scalia, the Supreme Court this week ruled in favor of an employee in a discrimination case under the Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act, or USERRA. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:30 am by koherston
Facts: When Mother and Father divorced in 2010, the trial court entered an agreed parenting plan in which the parents shared equal time with Child via alternating weeks. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 2:38 pm
in an unanimous opinion authored by Justice Scalia, the Supreme Court this week ruled in favor of an employee in a discrimination case under the Uniformed Services Employment and Re-employment Rights Act, or USERRA. [read post]