Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 8701 - 8720
of 12,883
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2012, 6:49 pm
Criminal charges were laid against individuals and gas retail companies, including Irving, Shell, Olco and Esso, pursuant to §45(1)(c) of the Competition Act. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:56 pm
Accordingly, we decline to consider [Lannett’s] grandfathering claim prior to exhaustion of the company’s administrative remedies. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 1:45 pm
An agency relationship can be created under different theories of authority, as set forth in Section 140 of the Restatement (Second) of Agency: (a) the agent was authorized; (b) the agent was apparently authorized; or (c) the agent had a power arising from the agency relationship and not dependent upon authority or apparent authority. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
BAI Ltd v Thomas Bates and Son Ltd, BAI Ltd v Durham, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance, Municipal Mutual Insurance Ltd v Zurich Insurance Company and Adur District Council and Ors, Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Fleming and Anor, Municipal Mutual Insurance Company v Zurich Insurance Company and Ors, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Edwards, Excess Insurance Company Ltd v Akzo Nobel UK Ltd and Excess Insurance Company… [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 4:31 pm
K-V Pharmaceutical Company, C.A. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 1:55 pm
On reading this, the Dutch Supreme Court acknowledged that the Den Bosch Court of Appeal had applied the correct test for assessing the distinctive character of a shape (Joined Cases C-456/01 P and C-457/01P Henkel KGaA v OHIM; Case C-25/05 August Storck KG v OHIM and Joined Cases C-53/01, C-54/01 and C-55/01, Linde AG). [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 1:24 pm
” Enforcement Section 105(c) contains the enforcement provisions of the bill. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:06 am
Although the High Court in this case followed Vocam and granted a stay, Fulham appealed on four principal grounds: (a) the relief in an unfair prejudice claim would affect third parties and hence was not arbitrable; (b) the very nature of the unfair prejudice claim was one which involved public interest and could not be resolved by a private contractual arrangement; (c) the 2006 Act impliedly rendered the right to approach a Court for an unfair prejudice claim an… [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 9:38 am
That’s the conclusion of a recent Guardian article that criticizes Harvard’s David Keith and the Carnegie Institute’s Ken Caldeira for a) receiving outside money to study geoengineering; b) having stakes in companies that are developing technology that could be used for geoengineering and c) advocating for additional government research into geoengineering. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:40 pm
Tonight three companies, Verizon, Microsoft, and WordPress, pushed out new content in an update that (a) addressed phantom problems, (b) rendered a previously functional system temporarily non-functional, and (c) not only failed to improve the system, but made the system affirmatively worse. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 3:29 pm
That, notwithstanding the lessor's negligence or breach, lessor was exempt from any liability due to conditions of the premises; c. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:29 am
In October 2010 Sawabeh Information Services Company (“SISCOM”) purchased Edcomm. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:47 am
It states it has “more high risk consumers than Manitoba because it has over 80% of Canada’s capital markets and international companies” and that “Ontario is the financial markets capital of Canada”. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 6:03 am
Plaintiffs The Ranis Company and Magno–Humphries Laboratories, Inc. [read post]
The SEC and Small Capital Formation: The Advisory Committee on Small and Emerging Companies (Part 1)
17 Feb 2012, 5:00 am
Gregory C. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 12:57 am
Absent some sort of formal formation or registration step that identifies an agent for service, it’s hard to see why I as a potential plaintiff should be happy to have risk fall on the AAA.), B. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 8:48 pm
Such funding was available to a buyer where an Australian company had the potential to enter into a contract with the buyer. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:47 pm
" As support she cites the leading treatise Ralph C. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Sometimes the Boards indicated that R 65(2) EPC 1973 was preferred to R 88 EPC 1973 as it was more specific (T 715/01 [9]); (b) decisions in which R 88 EPC 1973 was used as a legal basis for the corrections (T 814/98); (c) decisions in which correction was refused because the notice of appeal contained no remediable errors but rather a mistake of law. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 11:23 am
Any benefit as consideration for a decision, vote, recommendation or exercise of official discretion in a judicial or administrative proceeding; or c. [read post]
