Search for: "Does, A-H" Results 8701 - 8720 of 16,596
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2014, 6:36 am
An indictment unsealed Friday, Sept. 30, 2011 in Pittsburg County accuses Special Judge William H. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 12:18 am by Howard Weiss
And the Communications Act does not prohibit periods of non-operation of 11+ months. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:16 pm
How much leeway to modify public pensions does a “fiscal emergency” offer? [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 5:40 am by James Jensen
The limit of 85,000 H-1B visas is specific for potential employees initially seeking to acquire H-1B visa or status, and does not impact current H-1B employees. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 8:12 pm by A. Brian Albritton
In so ruling, the California 5th District Court of Appeals acknowledged that section 3730(h)(2) provides that "an action under this subsection may be brought in the appropriate district court of the United States" and that section 31 U.S.C. 3732(a) provides further that "Any action under section 3730 may be bought in any judicial district . . . " Yet, the Court noted, that the FCA does not "contain an explicit statutory directive ousting state court jurisdiction" and the "FCA's… [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 3:42 am by Jon Hyman
As we know, however, the First Amendment does not apply to private workplaces, in which employees do not enjoy constitutional free speech rights. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Nowhere in the statute nor in the regulations does it at all indicate that entire classifications of employees are forestalled from being considered for L-1B transfers. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Nowhere in the statute nor in the regulations does it at all indicate that entire classifications of employees are forestalled from being considered for L-1B transfers. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 5:01 pm by Angelo A. Paparelli
Nowhere in the statute nor in the regulations does it at all indicate that entire classifications of employees are forestalled from being considered for L-1B transfers. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 1:02 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
  Other Code sections that can play a role include § 522(h) and various parts of §§ 546 and 550. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:36 am
In that case, the California Court of Appeal considered a challenge under the state and federal contract clauses to charter amendment H, a 1982 amendment to the L.A. city charter that placed a 3% cap on (previously uncapped) cost-of-living adjustments to police and firefighters’ pension benefits. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 12:07 pm
In 1982, charter amendment H in the city of Los Angeles placed a 3% cap on COLAs for police and firefighter pensions. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 9:58 am by Jeffrey R. Gottlieb
  It does not apply to Illinois Estate Tax or to Federal Generation-Skipping Transfer Tax. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 8:54 am by Terry Hart
One does not win popularity contests critiquing fair use. [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 6:46 am by Jessica Smith
A person is guilty of first-degree kidnapping when he or she (1) (a)        confines, (b)        restrains, or (c)        removes from one place to another (2)        a person (3) (a)        without the person’s consent or, (b)        if the person is under 16, without consent of the… [read post]