Search for: "English v. English"
Results 8701 - 8720
of 11,204
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2011, 4:22 am
In Rodrigues v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 1:00 am
On its website, the German Collection Society “VG Wort” now informs us that it has again written to Judge Denny Chin of the New York District Court in relation to the “Google Book Settlement” case (The Author’s Guild et al v Google, Inc., case no 1: 05-cv-08136 (DC)).In its letter to the court of 14 February 2011 (which can be retrieved via VG Wort’s website by clicking here (in English)) the German Collection Society requests an extension of the… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:40 am
Michael Bloch QC, for Lucasfilm, urged that the court assert subject-matter jurisdiction and enforce the US copyrights; this was advanced on three bases: 1. in light of the decision in Owusu (C-281/02) the English court is under a duty to accept such jurisdiction; 2. that such jurisdiction in respect of copyright enforcement was in any case established by the Court of Appeal in Pearce v Ove Arup [2000] Ch. 403; or 3. in the absence of compulsory jurisdiction, there remains a… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 12:24 am
Supreme Court’s Morrison v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:59 pm
Rosalind English will be posting on this later in the week. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 10:30 pm
The recent judgment of Mr Justice Peter Jackson in London Borough of Hillingdon v Neary gives a great discussion of some of the key issues, and I really recommend reading it. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 1:48 pm
The English kingdom is restored, but it's France that restores it. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 12:29 pm
The issues are (1) the application of copyright protection under English law to three dimensional works; and (2) whether a claim of an infringement under US copyright law is justiciable in England. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:43 am
In Attorney General v Associated Newspapers Ltd & News Group Newspapers Ltd. ([2011] EWHC 418 (Admin)) The Sun and Daily Mail newspapers had published online a photograph of a defendant in a murder trial showing him posing with a gun. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 4:15 am
And in Staub v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:39 am
The decision was FCC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
In plain English? [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:30 am
FCC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:30 am
FCC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 6:44 am
The crux of the debate appears to be whether, in a case where a defendant resides in England, an English court is obliged to hear and determine an action relating to infringement of copyright outside the EU. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 1:45 am
Aviva was entitled to recover the sums paid to Mr Brown for alternative accommodation and the cost of repairs (Direct Line v Fox did not assist Mr Brown). [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:24 pm
[i.e. a relation of the averagely observant and informed consumer who drives EU law, rather than the English 'moron in a hurry']. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 7:16 am
Snyder v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:29 am
(s.2(2)) The test has been long-established, and was stated by Lord Diplock in Attorney General v English[1980] AC 116 at 141H-142C: If, as in the instant case, and probably in most other criminal trials upon indictment, it is the outcome of the trial or the need to discharge the jury without proceeding to a verdict that is put at risk, there can be no question that that which in the course of justice is put at risk is as serious as anything could be. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 1:35 am
Snyder v. [read post]
