Search for: "Ex Parte May" Results 8701 - 8720 of 11,474
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2013, 6:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  When asking what behavior has been deterred, apply same standard.Menell: most investments are best thought of ex ante. [read post]
8 May 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Though the form includes a check-box for appeal fee payment, the form itself states that this check is to be performed only in ex parte cases (where interlocutory revision by the Examining Division under A 109 is possible […]). [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 8:05 pm
Peterson, CFLS A November, 2016 appellate decision in California (Cassinelli), coupled with a May, 2017 United States Supreme Court decision (Howell), seemingly forecloses all meaningful enforcement avenues in California for aggrieved spouses of former military members whose divided share of community military pension benefits has been diluted or eliminated by the latter party’s unilateral, extra-judicial election to receive VA disability benefits (thereby waiving all or… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology – ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
(IP finance) US General - Decisions PepsiCo's $1.2 billion court no-show in trade secrets misappropriation case brought in connection with AquaFina bottled water (IPKat) Adequately indentifying trade secrets in California trade secret misappropriation litigation: Brescia v Angelin (JIPLP) US Patent Reform Patent 'reform' may happen this year, after all (Patent Docs) US Patents Study conducted by Stuart J H Graham and Dietmar Harhoff concludes US would benefit from EPO-style… [read post]
8 May 2022, 2:35 pm by Russell Knight
It is “improper for the trial court to consider the evidence heard at the ex parte hearing” People ex rel. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
(IP finance) US General - Decisions PepsiCo's $1.2 billion court no-show in trade secrets misappropriation case brought in connection with AquaFina bottled water (IPKat) Adequately indentifying trade secrets in California trade secret misappropriation litigation: Brescia v Angelin (JIPLP) US Patent Reform Patent 'reform' may happen this year, after all (Patent Docs) US Patents Study conducted by Stuart J H Graham and Dietmar Harhoff concludes US would benefit from EPO-style… [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 5:37 am by Nicholas Nugent
(This post is part of a five-part series on regulating online content moderation.) [read post]
5 Sep 2016, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Much of this information may be generated by organisations in the private sector and requested by agencies directly from them. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 4:24 am
Ex parte Arthur, 711 So. 2d 1097 (Ala. 1997) Arthur's application for re-hearing was denied 1998. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 5:07 pm by Kevin M. Mazza, Esq.
HLM, an unpublished decision issued on May 13, 2014, where the defendant had been found guilty of writing “disturbing” posts on Facebook regarding her ex-husband and children in violation of a special condition of probation (SCP), and rejecting the defendant’s First Amendment claims in that regard. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Prejudice is not a necessary condition for delay to be inordinate, although it may contribute to such a finding. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 2:50 am by Kurt R. Karst
Best Price Stacking We previously blogged about the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in United States Ex Rel. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 12:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Roe also reported as part of her Title IX complaint that she had suffered a rib fracture from her encounter with Doe on February 13. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 3:27 pm by Giles Peaker
” This broadly mirrored the case law, notably, R v Brent LBC, ex p. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 2:16 pm by Courtney Minick
In any proceedings under this section, the Court shall, upon request of the Government, review ex parte and in camera any Government submission, or portions of a submission, which may include classified information. [read post]