Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 8701 - 8720 of 21,695
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
” In the latest episode of SCOTUStalk (podcast), Mark Walsh joins Amy Howe to discuss last week’s oral argument in Iancu v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 4:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thus, as plaintiffs facts alleging extortion do not state a claim, so too are plaintiff’s claims that the Schutzer defendants submitted a forged document insufficient to state a claim. [read post]
3 May 2008, 9:28 am
This is not unlike the personal computer that the defendant in United States v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:57 pm
A trade mark registration is prima facie evidence that the mark is registered and valid (Lane Capital Mgmt v Lane Capital Mgmt (1999)). [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 10:46 am by Holly Brezee
A “statemark protects the mark in connection with goods or services in the particular state or states in which the mark is registered (like a federal mark but limited to the specific state that grants the registration). [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 7:45 am by Jay Willis
Jackson, as does Clifford Marks at the WSJ Law Blog. [read post]
6 Sep 2015, 3:43 am by INFORRM
For the respondents: Bruce McClintock SC and Matthew Richardson instructed by Mark O’Brien, Paul Svilans and Andrea Rejante of Johnson Winter & Slattery. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 7:39 am by PaulKostro
Super. at 436 (citation and quotation marks omitted). [read post]