Search for: "State v. Code"
Results 8701 - 8720
of 27,233
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2017, 6:11 am
State v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 5:57 am
Code Ann. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 7:20 pm
The Village’s Zoning Code required the petitioner to have 54 off-street parking spaces. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 5:55 am
In Clary v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:00 am
In the case of Clark v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 10:42 am
Additional Resources: Easterling v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Code. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am
The CAT, then, is not just an element of Ohio’s revenue structure; it has emerged as the focal point of an emerging national debate over the role, if any, of gross receipts taxes in a modern tax code. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:49 pm
Case law and a cuppa Sad as I am I actually read them over a cup of tea, such as the bizarre case of Regina v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
After the Supreme Court’s 2013 ruling in United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 6:15 pm
Facts: This case (Pertile et al v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
(Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
(Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:41 pm
Plummer v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:11 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 1:09 pm
Criminal procedure — Illegal sentence — Merger of carrying gun and possession of gun by prohibited person A jury in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City convicted Montez Single (“Appellant”) of two separate crimes: 1) wearing, carrying, or transporting a handgun on the person, Maryland Code (2002, 2012 Repl. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
He’s Wrong * Senate’s “Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act of 2017”–and Section 230’s Imminent Evisceration * The “Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017” Bill Would Be Bad News for Section 230 * WARNING: Draft “No Immunity for Sex Traffickers Online Act” Bill Poses Major Threat to Section 230 * The Implications of Excluding State Crimes from 47 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 5:22 pm
TRUMP, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1182(f) and 1185(a), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, hereby find that, absent the measures set forth in this proclamation, the immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of persons described in section 2 of this proclamation would be… [read post]
