Search for: "US v. Levelle Grant"
Results 8701 - 8720
of 9,110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2008, 1:18 pm
US v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 8:31 am
Graham v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:09 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, March 18, 2008 US v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:29 am
A10334
Lancman -- Allows N.Y. state residents to receive change or update in subdirectory of level 2 and 3 sex offender by e-mail in specific locality at no charge Same as S 2263 Last Act: 03/19/08 referred to correction
Last Action Date: 03/20/08(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 10:59 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 4:40 am
" Maryland v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:05 am
Finally, as long as I'm here on a limited brief I'm going to use the opportunity to link up my observations on the art of the elevator speech and the oral arguments in District of Columbia v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 11:24 am
The process however, as the court noted in United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 2:10 am
A1179A
Gunther (MS) -- Sets forth procedures to be followed in the event a sex offender fails to mail a signed verification within twenty calendar days of mailing by DCJS No Same as Last Act: 03/11/08 amend and recommit to codes03/11/08 print number 1179aA9859A
Lentol (MS) -- Protects people who use the internet from convicted sex offenders Same as S 6875-A Last Act: 03/11/08 reported referred to ways and meansS266
ALESI -- Restricts… [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:15 pm
The case, Lee v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 11:53 am
The Eighth Circuit today handed down an opinion in US v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, March 07, 2008 US v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
When a Member State's law grants a monopoly of exploitation to the owner of such a right, it follows that the owner may forbid any unauthorized third party, or infringer, from any sale, use or other exploitation within that State.[40] If an industrial or commercial property right has considerable economic significance, the owner in one State usually seeks to obtain parallel protection in all of the other States of the Community; however, this is not always possible, either… [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 7:53 am
The Court of Appeals published Williams v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:32 am
S6920A
MAZIARZ -- Prohibits level two or three sex offenders from voting at a school or facility for children Same as A 9699-A Last Act: 03/07/08 AMEND (T) AND RECOMMIT TO CODES03/07/08 PRINT NUMBER 6920AS7106
ADAMS -- Relates to sex offenses facilitated by the use of controlled substances and "date rape drugs" No Same as Last Act: 03/07/08 REFERRED TO HEALTH
Last Action Date: 03/09/08(Results Count = ) Bill No. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 3:35 pm
Last week, a California Court of Appeal took a step towards leveling the playing field in Harrington v. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
: (IPEG), Property Rights Alliance releases ‘International property rights index 2008 report’ ranking countries on the level of protection they provide to IP: (IAM), (Spicy IP), (Afro-IP), Analysis of Microsoft’s open arms: (Innovationpartners) Intellectual Property Watch discussion forum: Should the International Standards Organisation approve the Microsoft OOXML document format as a global standard? [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:23 am
The motion court found that the defendant's conduct was dangerous and ill-conceived, but it did not rise to the level of depraved indifference as defined by People v Feingold, 7 NY3d 288. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
The court overruled the objection to acceptance, but lacked jurisdiction to grant a third level because the government did not move for it. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, February 25, 2008 US v. [read post]
