Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 8721 - 8740 of 16,494
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2014, 11:33 am by Stuart Benjamin
Circuit (again with Judge Tatel writing) found not to be common carriage regulations a year ago in Cellco Partnership v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 11:14 am by Timothy Sandefur, guest-blogging
Black had served as Chief Justice of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, and while there he had issued a fascinating decision called Sharpless v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 9:28 am by Ronald Mann
My preview suggested that Monday’s argument in Law v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:01 am by Stewart Baker
 That is, they hoped that  state authorities could use their enforcement power to blunt or redirect the thrust of federal policy. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:42 am by Stuart Benjamin
This reading of § 706, as we said in Comcast Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:48 am by Jay Yurkiw
However, the court did permit the plaintiff to introduce evidence at trial of the defendant’s failure to preserve text messages and argue “whatever inference they hope the jury will draw. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 5:58 am by Yishai Schwartz
At the same time, Jane updated us on motions in Aamer v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 10:57 am by Mark Graber
  We discuss whether courts made the correct decision in such cases as Windsor v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
Almost immediately, rumors circulated that the toll booths had been closed by Christie’s Port Authority appointees because Fort Lee’s Democratic Mayor Mark Sokolich had refused to endorse Christie’s reelection bid, which he wanted to be a landslide in order to show as a Republican (and a presidential bid hopeful) that he could win big in a Democratic state like New Jersey. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 4:12 am by David DePaolo
I hope Mom doesn't pull out any butcher knives... [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Clause 4 is a ‘reasonable publication’ defence not a ‘responsible publication’ defence reflecting the latest common law as outlined by Lord Brown in Flood v Times. [read post]