Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges" Results 8721 - 8740 of 9,824
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2009, 5:46 am
After Keeter's accident, some tower operators said they would re-evaluate their safety methods. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(BLOG@IP::JUR) New Madrid fees for applications designating the EU to become effective 12 August (Class 46) Latest European appellations registered: Polish TSG Olej rydzowy for oils; Italian PGI Abbacchio Romano for meat (Class 46) India Patents, public interest and pricing: Madras High Court decision in M C Jayasingh v Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd & Ors (Spicy IP) Ramkumar patent case: New Delhi Customs favours Samsung; Customs order stayed by Madras High Court (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP)… [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 10:25 am
Yes, Wilder is a public figure, but he didn't engage in any illegal behavior (that we're aware of). [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:13 am
Judge e-books by their coversThat is, by their interface and hardware. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
  In Re Henry, the deceased died on May 28, 2005. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 7:16 am
Facebook had alleged that StudiVZ, which has many more subscribers in Germany than the US giant’s German language site, had copied its design and illegally got hold of the codes needed to re-create its graphics and features. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 1:12 am
And as you might expect, they're among the savviest users of legal tech in the profession. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 11:00 pm
So it tried the "tried by consent" route.TTABlog postscript: Compare this decision with In re Picture Entertainment Corporation, Serial No. 78917269 (June 10, 2009) [not precedential], in which (in an another opinion written by Judge Seeherman) the Board affirmed a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark LA CONFIDENTIAL for clothing in view of a prior registration of the same mark for comic books and fiction books.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 10:24 am
Ex-offenders are also confronted with a lack of meaningful re-entry programs. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 7:14 am
 Shortly after the contract's inception, delays and design issues caused the contractors to miss their first flight date, ultimately causing the Navy to unilaterally modify the aircraft delivery dates. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
Alternatively, a re-formulation of the rule on plurality of defendants might be envisaged in order to enhance the role of the courts of the Member State where the primary responsible defendant is domiciled. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 8:44 am
Stone, we're told, does not rise to the level of "imminent. [read post]