Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 8721 - 8740
of 21,695
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
49% thought native ads were unpaid v. 12% for non-native; remainder unsure.What if we tweak the label? [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
Oracle v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 12:36 pm
In Bachar v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 10:25 am
Predictable v. unpredictable. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 1:15 am
[AppleResponse] The statute states that an adjudged infringer “shall be liable to the owner to the extent of his total profit. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 10:40 am
For example, our Advertising and Marketing Law casebook covers the FTC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 8:40 am
State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:45 am
In Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
In Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:09 am
Supreme Court decision, Miranda v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
It certainly does not hurt those opposing the CRAFT BEER ATTORNEY mark that the TTAB stated in this decision, albeit a non-precedential one, that “no amount of evidence can transform a generic phrase into a registrable trademark” citing Miller Brewing Co. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 3:34 am
In Willis Re, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 1:34 pm
However, as demonstrated in the Court of Appeal’s decision in Fernandes v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 12:45 pm
CalECPA was introduced by California State Senators Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) and Joel Anderson (R-Alpine), who both fought for years to get stronger digital privacy protections for Californians. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:50 am
”) The Israel-Lebanon border is marked with a green sign, attached to a fence with military-style camouflage netting, that has Hebrew, English, and Arabic writing. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees, you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 6:19 am
” Hughes v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 3:30 am
Like the Nazi use of the pink triangle, the US Supreme Court’s 1903 decision in Lone Wolf v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 1:00 am
HTC Corp., United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit, No. 2015-1754, 11 July 2016 appeared first on Kluwer Patent Blog. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 2:13 pm
” If you recall, in my case Eells v. [read post]
