Search for: "State v. House" Results 8721 - 8740 of 28,798
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2011, 2:11 pm by NL
Akhtar v Birmingham City Council [2011] EWCA Civ 383 [not on bailii yet, we've seen a transcript] When a Local Authority accepts the applicant’s case on a review under s.202 review under Housing Act 1996, is there or should there be a duty to give reasons why the applicant was successful and on what objections they were not successful? [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Mitty J surveyed the various tests for proportionality, articulated in the common law (by Lord Clyde in de Freitas v Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries, Lands and Housing [1991] 1 AC 69; in Strasbourg (Sporrong & Lönnroth v Sweden [1982] 5 EHRR 35) and James v United Kingdom [1986] 8EHRR 123. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 8:53 am by Abbott & Kindermann
Trustees of the California State University, S199557. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:55 am
* The UK Implements the Unitary Patent - Statutory Instrument passedDarren and his colleague Robert Barker pen a detailed post upon the Statutory Instrument that will implement the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court in UK law, which was approved by the House of Commons on 1 March and the House of Lords on 2 March. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Interestingly, the EU doesn’t mention the United States, which is arguably the most significant country yet to implement an effective site-blocking regime. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm by Tessa Shepperson
Daniel Milnes of Forbes Solicitors states: “While using drones may result in saving money in maintenance in the short term, if legal obligations are not seriously considered it could cost a housing association much more if it resulted in a data protection breach. [read post]
14 Jan 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
United States The Socially Aware Blog has a post which considers a recent decision made by the Sixth Circuit in Signature Management Team, LLC v. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:45 am
Cameron Russell (Center for Law & Information Policy, Fordham Law School) likened the legal developments in U.S. music licensing to building additions to a house. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 9:01 am by Elie Mystal
But it’s not bigger than the federal government or the Constitution of the United States of America.That’s the lesson the Third Circuit handed down today with its decision in the Lozano v. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 3:41 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
When it considered the very same phrase in R v Salford Health Authority; Ex p Janaway [1989] AC 537, the House of Lords decided that “treatment” meant “the process of treatment in hospital for the termination of pregnancy” and “participate” meant “actually taking part in that process”. [read post]
2 May 2013, 1:45 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Discriminatory lending practices of American financial institutions as highlighted in our lawsuit, Adkins et al. v. [read post]
2 May 2013, 1:45 pm by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
Discriminatory lending practices of American financial institutions as highlighted in our lawsuit, Adkins et al. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 2:50 pm by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
In support of such informal abandonment, the taxpayer cited United States v. [read post]