Search for: "U.S. Judiciary" Results 8721 - 8740 of 11,664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2010, 2:57 pm by Matt Bodie
 First, the article finds a big disparity between the U.S. judiciary as a whole (38% say too liberal, 18% too conservative) and the Supreme Court in particular (33% too liberal, 27% too conservative). [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 1:19 pm by Betsy McKenzie
This is just concerning the Internet, because of the fact that the Domain Name Registry is legally within the jurisdiction of the U.S., like most of the Internet. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 9:43 am by brettb
  Well, I guess the folks in the U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm by Tom Goldstein
In February, I had this post on the question of whether Justices Stevens and Ginsburg would retire, who would be nominated, and what the vote would be. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 11:20 am by Ray Dowd
About the Federal Bar Association The FBA is the premier bar association serving the federal practitioner and judiciary. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Bloomberg's Testimony as Prepared for Delivery Before the U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 5:50 am by Matt Osenga
  She received a confirmation hearing in July, but has yet to receive a vote by the Judiciary Committee. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 3:08 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court makes it unlikely that the judiciary will intercede and curb the use of information as a social control strategy in a fundamental way. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 10:59 am by immigrationprof
HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE ON “THE ROLE OF IMMIGRATION IN STRENGTHENING AMERICA’S ECONOMY” National Coalition of... [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by Guest Blogger
In the end, one legacy of the “war on terrorism” may be the judiciary’s failure to address the question at the heart of all the litigation this “war” has spawned.Jonathan Hafetz is Associate Professor of Law at Seton Hall University School of Law. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:54 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
This Article argues that the judiciary’s restriction of access to federal courts ignores important foreign relations, trade, and regulatory considerations. [read post]